Demolishing Kashgar's History
A vital stop on China's ancient Silk Road, the Uighur city of Kashgar may lose its old quarter to plans for "progress"
- By Joshua Hammer
- Photographs by Michael Christopher Brown
- Smithsonian magazine, March 2010, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 4)
The Chinese government says the demolition is needed to fortify the Old City against earthquakes, the most recent of which struck the region in February 2003, killing 263 people and destroying thousands of buildings. “The entire Kashgar area is in a special area in danger of earthquakes,” Xu Jianrong, Kashgar’s deputy mayor, said recently. “I ask you: What country’s government would not protect its citizens from the dangers of natural disaster?”
But many in Kashgar don’t buy the government’s explanation. They say officials carried out no inspection of the Old City’s houses before condemning them and that most of those that collapsed in recent earthquakes were newly constructed concrete dwellings, not traditional Uighur homes. “These buildings were designed to withstand earthquakes, and used for many centuries,” Hu Xinyu of the BCHPC said of the traditional architecture. He suspects the widespread demolition has a more sinister motive: to deprive the Uighurs of their main symbol of cultural identity. Others view the destruction as punishment for Uighur militancy. The flood of Han Chinese into Xinjiang energized a small Uighur secessionist movement; Uighur attacks against Chinese soldiers and police have occurred sporadically in recent years. The government may well see the Old City as a breeding ground for both Uighur nationalism and violent insurrection. “In their minds, these mazelike alleyways could become a hotbed for terrorist activities,” says Hu.
To halt the destruction, the BCHPC recently petitioned Unesco to add Kashgar to a list of Silk Road landmarks being considered for United Nations World Heritage status, which obliges governments to protect them. China conspicuously left Kashgar off the list of Silk Road sites the government submitted to Unesco. “If nothing is done today,” says Hu, “next year this city will be gone.”
Ling, Mahmati and I had flown southwest to Kashgar from Urumqi, an industrial city of 2.1 million now 80 percent Han Chinese. The China Southern Airways jet had ascended over a sea of cotton and wheat fields at the edge of Urumqi, crossed a rugged zone of crenelated canyons and translucent blue lakes, then soared over the Tian Shan Mountains—a vast, forbidding domain of black basalt peaks, many covered in snow and ice, rising to 20,000 feet—before setting down in Kashgar.
The three of us climbed nervously into a taxi in front of the tiny airport. A government notice posted in the taxi warned passengers to be vigilant against Uighur terrorists. “We should clear our eyes to distinguish between right and wrong,” it advised in both Chinese and the Arabic script of the Uighur language (related to Turkish).
Two months earlier, on July 5, Uighur anger had erupted lethally in Urumqi, when Uighur youths went on a rampage, reportedly stabbing and beating to death 197 people and injuring more than 1,000. (The rioting began as a protest against the killings of two Uighur laborers by fellow Han workers in a southern China toy factory.) Rioting also broke out in Kashgar but was quickly put down. The government blamed the violence on Uighur secessionists and virtually cut off western Xinjiang from the outside world: it shut down the Internet, banned text messages and blocked outgoing international telephone calls.
Just outside the airport, we hit a massive traffic jam: the police had set up a roadblock and were checking identifications and searching every car headed into Kashgar. The tension was even more pronounced as we reached the city center. Truckloads of People’s Liberation Army soldiers rumbled down wide boulevards, past an unsightly mélange of billboards, glass-and-steel banks, the high-rise headquarters of China Telecom and a concrete tower called the Barony Tarim Petroleum Hotel. More troops stood vigilant on sidewalks or ate their lunches in small clusters in People’s Square, a huge plaza dominated by a 50-foot-high statue of Chairman Mao, one of the largest still standing in China.
We pulled into the Hotel Seman, an 1890 relic. Pink-and-green molded ceilings, Ottoman-style arched wall niches and dusty Afghan carpets lining dimly lit hallways evoked a distant era. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Russian consulate was located here, lorded over by diplomat Nicholas Petrovsky, who kept 49 Cossack bodyguards. As Russia tried to extend its influence over the region, Petrovsky and his British counterpart, Consul George Macartney, spent decades spying on each other. When the Chinese revolution that put an end to imperial rule and brought Sun Yat-sen to power reached Kashgar in 1912, violence broke out in the streets. “My one thought was that the children and I must be in clean clothes if we were to be murdered,” Macartney’s wife, Lady Catherine, wrote in her diary. “We all appeared at 4:30 a.m. as though we were going to a garden party, in spotless white!” (The family returned safely to England after departing China in 1918.)
The hotel’s glory days were well behind it. In the dusty and empty lobby, a Uighur clerk in traditional brocade dress and head scarf handed us a blank hotel register—foreign visitors had nearly disappeared since the July violence in Urumqi. At a deserted Internet café, the proprietor reassured us that we were not totally incommunicado. “I have a nephew in Xian,” he said. “I can fax him your message, and then he will send it over the Internet to where you want it to go.”
To tour the back streets of the Old City, Mahmati, Ling and I took a taxi to the Kashgar River, the murky waterway that divides Kashgar, and climbed to a hive of mud-brick buildings hugging a hillside. As the din of the modern city dropped away, we turned a corner and entered a world of monochromatic browns and beiges, gloom and dust, mosques on nearly every corner (162 at last count) and the occasional motor scooter putt-putting though the alleys. A team of Chinese officials carrying briefcases and notepads squeezed past us in one lane. “Are you going out on a tourist excursion?” one of them, a middle-aged woman, asked, and Mahmati and Ling nodded nervously; both surmised the officials were taking a door-to-door survey of the neighborhood’s families in anticipation of evicting them.
In an alley bathed in the perpetual shadow of vaulted archways, we fell into conversation with a man whom I’ll call Abdullah. A handsome figure with an embroidered cap, gray mustache and piercing green eyes, he was standing outside the bright green door to his home, chatting with two neighbors. Abdullah sells mattresses and clothing near the Id -Kah Mosque, the city’s grandest. During the past few years, he told us, he had watched the Chinese government chip away at the Old City—knocking down the ancient 35-foot-high earthen berm that surrounded it, creating wide boulevards through dense warrens of homes, putting up an asphalt plaza in place of a colorful bazaar in front of the mosque. Abdullah’s neighborhood was next. Two months before, officials told residents that they would be relocated in March or April. “The government says the walls are weak, it will not survive an earthquake, but it is absolutely strong enough,” Abdullah told us. “We don’t want to leave, it is history—ancient tradition. But we can’t stop it.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Communities Renovation and Restoration The Silk Road China
Additional Sources
"Islam and Modernity in China: Secularization or Separatism?" by Dru C. Gladney, in Chinese Religiosities: Afflictions of Modernity and State Formation, edited by Mayfair Yang, University of California Press, 2008
"Rumblings from the Uyghur" by Dru C. Gladney, in China: Contemporary Political, Economic, and International Affairs, edited by David B. H. Denoon, New York University Press, 2007
Violent Separatism in Xinjiang: A Critical Assessment by James A. Millward, East-West Center (Washington, D.C.), 2004









Comments (5)
More info on the demolition: http://www.demotix.com/news/1106549/old-city-kashgar-disappears-under-chinese-reconstruction
Posted by hal on March 17,2012 | 12:03 PM
The sad thing is, that the world will do absolutely nothing, nada, zilch. This is China we are talking about, the country which holds more US and Europe govenrment debt to make your eyes sore. The newest richest country, which will replace the US as superpower within the next 40 years. Even the ANC government in South Africa, forgetting their roots and what they said they stood for, long enough to refuse the Dalai Lama to attend Desmond Tutu's 80th birthday bash.
In the end of course it will be China who will have lost their heritage. But, as with the Taliban and the Buddhas of the Bamiyan Valley, Philestines are destined never to learn from their barbaric acts.
Posted by Dirk on October 18,2011 | 09:26 PM
I believe China is destroying Uigur Civilization.It needs to stop. Area is not Xingjiang, should called Turkestan. That is a historical name for that area.Xingjiang came in late century by the Chinese authoroties because of they wanted to change Turkestans' etnic identity.Chinese starts an etnic cleansing or genocide type of killing,destroying Uigur culture.IT is not very late we can help.
Posted by Suzan Devletsah on November 19,2010 | 09:04 AM
Thank you for your article...its nice to see the other side of the story reported. Kashgar is not only an acient city that is an important mark along the Silk Route, it is a part of the Uighur identity. Destroying Kashagar will destroy yet another part of Uighur identity that has managed to survive the Dragon's fire.
The claims made by the Chinese government that the archeticture in Kasgar is suseptible to earthquakes is an unvalid one. This city has been around for thousands of years and it has survived. If you look to natural disasters in China, you see them in modern cities where there are modern buildings. China isn't trying to help the Uighurs here, they are masking their attack on Uighur identity. If their intention was to protect uighurs from disasters then they would not have done nuclear testing at Lop-Nur where the Uighurs are mutated by high concentration of nuclear chemicals. Once again, this is no move to help the Uighur people; its an initiative to continue to destruct the Uighur people through an aggressive attack on their culture and identity.
The world needs to act. This is not mearly the question of perserving an acient city, but a question of perserving the Uighur people.
Posted by uyghur on February 25,2010 | 10:12 PM
if you have done more homework on Xingjiang's history .this article will be a different one.Xingjiang is my hometown,my family have lived more than three generations there.I'm not Han or Uighur.the last thing we people need is the so-called help or sympathy from the western.
Posted by FRR on February 20,2010 | 07:38 AM