John Brown's Day of Reckoning
The abolitionist's bloody raid on a federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry 150 years ago set the stage for the Civil War
- By Fergus M. Bordewich
- Smithsonian magazine, October 2009, Subscribe
Harpers Ferry, Virginia, lay sleeping on the night of October 16, 1859, as 19 heavily armed men stole down mist-shrouded bluffs along the Potomac River where it joins the Shenandoah. Their leader was a rail-thin 59-year-old man with a shock of graying hair and penetrating steel-gray eyes. His name was John Brown. Some of those who strode across a covered railway bridge from Maryland into Virginia were callow farm boys; others were seasoned veterans of the guerrilla war in disputed Kansas. Among them were Brown's youngest sons, Watson and Oliver; a fugitive slave from Charleston, South Carolina; an African-American student at Oberlin College; a pair of Quaker brothers from Iowa who had abandoned their pacifist beliefs to follow Brown; a former slave from Virginia; and men from Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania and Indiana. They had come to Harpers Ferry to make war on slavery.
The raid that Sunday night would be the most daring instance on record of white men entering a Southern state to incite a slave rebellion. In military terms, it was barely a skirmish, but the incident electrified the nation. It also created, in John Brown, a figure who after a century and a half remains one of the most emotive touchstones of our racial history, lionized by some Americans and loathed by others: few are indifferent. Brown's mantle has been claimed by figures as diverse as Malcolm X, Timothy McVeigh, Socialist leader Eugene Debs and abortion protesters espousing violence. "Americans do not deliberate about John Brown—they feel him," says Dennis Frye, the National Park Service's chief historian at Harpers Ferry. "He is still alive today in the American soul. He represents something for each of us, but none of us is in agreement about what he means."
"The impact of Harpers Ferry quite literally transformed the nation," says Harvard historian John Stauffer, author of The Black Hearts of Men: Radical Abolitionists and the Transformation of Race. The tide of anger that flowed from Harpers Ferry traumatized Americans of all persuasions, terrorizing Southerners with the fear of massive slave rebellions, and radicalizing countless Northerners, who had hoped that violent confrontation over slavery could be indefinitely postponed. Before Harpers Ferry, leading politicians believed that the widening division between North and South would eventually yield to compromise. After it, the chasm appeared unbridgeable. Harpers Ferry splintered the Democratic Party, scrambled the leadership of the Republicans and produced the conditions that enabled Republican Abraham Lincoln to defeat two Democrats and a third-party candidate in the presidential election of 1860.
"Had John Brown's raid not occurred, it is very possible that the 1860 election would have been a regular two-party contest between antislavery Republicans and pro-slavery Democrats," says City University of New York historian David Reynolds, author of John Brown: Abolitionist. "The Democrats would probably have won, since Lincoln received just 40 percent of the popular vote, around one million votes less than his three opponents." While the Democrats split over slavery, Republican candidates such as William Seward were tarnished by their association with abolitionists; Lincoln, at the time, was regarded as one of his party's more conservative options. "John Brown was, in effect, a hammer that shattered Lincoln's opponents into fragments," says Reynolds. "Because Brown helped to disrupt the party system, Lincoln was carried to victory, which in turn led 11 states to secede from the Union. This in turn led to the Civil War."
Well into the 20th century, it was common to dismiss Brown as an irrational fanatic, or worse. In the rousing pro-Southern 1940 classic film Santa Fe Trail, actor Raymond Massey portrayed him as a wild-eyed madman. But the civil rights movement and a more thoughtful acknowledgment of the nation's racial problems have occasioned a more nuanced view. "Brown was thought mad because he crossed the line of permissible dissent," Stauffer says. "He was willing to sacrifice his life for the cause of blacks, and for this, in a culture that was simply marinated in racism, he was called mad."
Brown was a hard man, to be sure, "built for times of trouble and fitted to grapple with the flintiest hardships," in the words of his close friend, the African-American orator Frederick Douglass. Brown felt a profound and lifelong empathy with the plight of slaves. "He stood apart from every other white in the historical record in his ability to burst free from the power of racism," says Stauffer. "Blacks were among his closest friends, and in some respects he felt more comfortable around blacks than he did around whites."
Brown was born with the century, in 1800, in Connecticut, and raised by loving if strict parents who believed (as did many, if not most, in that era) that righteous punishment was an instrument of the divine. When he was a small boy, the Browns moved west in an ox-drawn wagon to the raw wilderness of frontier Ohio, settling in the town of Hudson, where they became known as friends to the rapidly diminishing population of Native Americans, and as abolitionists who were always ready to help fugitive slaves. Like many restless 19th-century Americans, Brown tried many professions, failing at some and succeeding modestly at others: farmer, tanner, surveyor, wool merchant. He married twice—his first wife died from illness—and, in all, fathered 20 children, almost half of whom died in infancy; 3 more would die in the war against slavery. Brown, whose beliefs were rooted in strict Calvinism, was convinced that he had been predestined to bring an end to slavery, which he believed with burning certitude was a sin against God. In his youth, both he and his father, Owen Brown, had served as "conductors" on the Underground Railroad. He had denounced racism within his own church, where African-Americans were required to sit in the back, and shocked neighbors by dining with blacks and addressing them as "Mr." and "Mrs." Douglass once described Brown as a man who "though a white gentleman, is in sympathy, a black man, and as deeply interested in our cause, as though his own soul had been pierced with the iron of slavery."
In 1848, the wealthy abolitionist Gerrit Smith encouraged Brown and his family to live on land Smith had bestowed on black settlers in northern New York. Tucked away in the Adirondack Mountains, Brown concocted a plan to liberate slaves in numbers never before attempted: A "Subterranean Pass-Way"—the Underground Railroad writ large—would stretch south through the Allegheny and Appalachian mountains, linked by a chain of forts manned by armed abolitionists and free blacks. "These warriors would raid plantations and run fugitives north to Canada," says Stauffer. "The goal was to destroy the value of slave property." This scheme would form the template for the Harpers Ferry raid and, says Frye, under different circumstances "could have succeeded. [Brown] knew that he couldn't free four million people. But he understood economics and how much money was invested in slaves. There would be a panic—property values would dive. The slave economy would collapse."
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (14)
Where are the personal papers of Reverend Joshua Young? His congregation in Burlington is turning two hundred and wishes to answer a few questions about his time with us.
Posted by Elizabeth Curtiss on April 14,2010 | 05:40 PM
Re: John Brown's Day of Reckoning By Fergus M. Bordewich
Smithsonian magazine, October 2009
The article by Mr Bordewich left the reader with the impression that all the sons of John Brown who participated in the raid on Harpers Ferry were killed during the attack.
An article was published in a local Huntingdon County Pennsylvania newspaper the Daily News October 16, 2009 that traced Owen Browns escape from the Maryland farm house, three miles from Harpers Ferry, where he was guarding the pikes and other weapons that were to be distributed if his fathers raid was successful.
Owen used the "Subterranean Pass-Way " from Chambersburg, Franklin County through Huntingdon County Pennsylvania north to Meadville, Pennsylvania. Owen's journey was told later in his life in the Atlantic Monthly, March 1874.
Posted by George John Drobnock on November 29,2009 | 10:39 AM
Outside of his determination for a cause that he believed in, I found little to admire regarding John Brown. His obsession with slavery ironically seemed to go beyond human nature itself, regardless the color of skin of anyone who opposed or disagreed with him. Not only did he massacre and butcher individuals in Kansas, but during the events at Harpers Ferry, he put the lives of a community, his men, his own life, as well as the lives of two of his sons at risk, showing no remorse or compassion as his sons were near death. The first casualty at Harpers Ferry was a man of color, who ironically was attempting to hinder the raid. Additional innocent people lost their lives at the hands of Brown and his fellow fanatics and yet Brown was anticipating thousands of slaves and supposed supporters from nearby regions to volunteer to die as well. Whether the bees had swarmed or not, as John Brown had predicted they would, Frederick Douglas was correct in his assertion that Brown was "going into a perfect steel trap" because Brown had chosen perhaps arguably the least defensible arsenal in the United States at that time. Similar to the Union troops that filled the crater at the battle of Petersburg, VA at the close of the Civil War, Brown and his men were sitting targets. It is quite clear that John Brown was not any less fanatical than John Wilkes Booth. It would not surprise me in the least if Brown's actions may have set Booth down an opposite and yet similar path to ruin. John Brown was hardly "an angel of light."
Posted by William Lewis on November 12,2009 | 09:16 AM
While I am sympathetic to Brown, is it not true that he also killed some women or children in Kansas?
Posted by j linder on November 7,2009 | 11:20 PM
I have been reading the companion book to the series of the Civil War recently on NPR. I stumbled on Smithstonian Oct 2009 and foun article by Fergus m Bordewich (p62) The article and illustrations are great!
Posted by JohnHOLT on October 30,2009 | 02:44 PM
In response to B.J Sims' question about the song "John Brown's Body," it appeared first in the 1850s as a religious camp meeting song that started, 'Say, brothers, will you meet us? On Canaan's happy shore?' The tune was picked up and the words changed by members of the Massachusetts Volunteer Militia to tease one of their young members, John Brown. As the song spread to other units it was assumed that the John Brown in the song was the one captured in Harpers Ferry. At some point Julia Ward Howe heard the song and published new lyrics in the Atlantic Monthly as "Battle Humn of the Republic." The young John Brown of the first version of the song didn't live long enough to hear later ones. He was drowned in the Shennandoah River at Front Royal Virginia early in the War.
Posted by Reader Services on October 19,2009 | 02:34 PM
I am proud to be the great great great granddaughter of Rev Joshua Young who preformed the funeral service for John Brown on Dec. 8,1859, in N. Elba, N.Y.
Posted by Diane Ingrick Steece on October 17,2009 | 01:47 PM
I think one of J. Brown's sons is buried in Altadena California.
Posted by robbie harper-sutton-johnson on October 12,2009 | 12:56 PM
I was wondering under what circumstances did the song "John Brown's Body" emerge and what role did it play during the Civil War?
Posted by B.J. Sims on October 12,2009 | 11:51 AM
Hey, it's no big deal. I was only expressing my concern about the omission of Shields Green from the article, but if there's no space, so let it be. This too shall pass. Best, Hb
Posted by Herb Boyd on October 1,2009 | 05:08 PM
John Brown was my second great grand father. When I was a kid I remember my uncle, C. Brown, telling me that John Brown had ample opportunity to flee Harper's Ferry when he realized that he wouldn't be getting the support that he'd expected. Instead however he chose to stay, believing that taking a stand and sacrificing his life was the only way to have a real impact on the entire country.
Posted by Matthew B. on September 30,2009 | 03:56 PM
I want to be an archeoligist someday to
Posted by on September 28,2009 | 11:51 AM
John Brown also had men in Kansas fight under his leadership and they were the late George & William Partridge & William W. Caine formerly of Wisconsin.
Amos Lawrence (cotton Whig)founder of Lawrence University of Appleton, Wisconsin provided John Brown with money and Sharpes Rifles.
The Wisconsin Republican Party sponsored John Brown & Gerritt Smith at a rally at Market Garden Milwuakee, Wisconsin June of 1857 for the anti-slavery cause. Takeing up a collection for John Brown's Kansas activities with the Underground Railroad through Iowa from Kansas with James redpath.
Posted by tom on September 25,2009 | 04:40 AM
John Brown, along with most of the raiders, are buried at his farm in North Elba (Lake Placid), NY. A symposium is planned Dec 5 that includes authors Margaret Washington, Russell Banks and Louis DeCaro, Jr, a panel that includes a person who was sold into slavery in the United States at age 16 (over 50,000 live in slavery in the US, 25 million+ world-wide), Alice Mecoy, a descendant of John Brown, author Kevin Bales, George Homes, Exec Dir of CORE, Bernadine Dorn. Activities include on Dec 6 a re-enactment of his cortege home across Lake Champlain, his body laying in state at the Essex County Courthouse, and burial at his grave (Dec 2), gospel concerts and much more.
www.johnbrowncominghome.com
Posted by Naj Wikoff on September 23,2009 | 07:52 PM