Abraham Lincoln, True Crime Writer
While practicing law in Springfield, Illinois, Abraham Lincoln defended a man in a highly unusual case and later recounted the mystery as a short story
- By Laura Helmuth
- Smithsonian.com, February 10, 2010, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
"William and Archibald have both died since—William in less than a year, and Archibald in about two years after the supposed murder. Henry is still living, but never speaks of the subject.
"It is not the object of the writer of this, to enter into the many curious speculations that might be indulged upon the facts of this narrative; yet he can scarcely forbear a remark upon what would, almost certainly have been the fate of William and Archibald, had Fisher not been found alive. It seems he had wandered away in mental derangement, and, had he died in this condition, and his body been found in the vicinity, it is difficult to conceive what could have saved the Trailors from the consequence of having murdered him. Or, if he had died, and his body never found, the case against them, would have been quite as bad, for, although it is a principle of law that a conviction for murder shall not be had, unless the body of the deceased be discovered, it is to be remembered, that Henry testified he saw Fisher’s dead body."
(Special Thanks to the Abraham Lincoln Association for the excerpt)
Lincoln wrote another version of the story in a letter to his friend Joshua Speed shortly after the case concluded. Lincoln’s sense of humor is apparent in the letter, especially in his observation of the courtroom’s reaction to the conclusion of the case:
"Thus stands this curious affair. When the doctor’s story was first made public, it was amusing to scan and contemplate the countenances and hear the remarks of those who had been actively in search for the dead body: some looked quizzical, some melancholy, and some furiously angry. Porter, who had been very active, swore he always knew the man was not dead, and that he had not stirred an inch to hunt for him; Langford, who had taken the lead in cutting down Hickox’s mill-dam, and wanted to hang Hickox for objecting, looked most awfully woebegone: he seemed the “victim of unrequited affection,” as represented in the comic almanacs we used to laugh over; and Hart, the little drayman that hauled Molly home once, said it was too damned bad to have so much trouble, and no hanging after all."
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (56)
+ View All Comments
If only both our contries had politicians of this great leader's ability here in to-day's world, maybe we wouldn't be in the fix we are? A great man whose greatness still glows...
Posted by Ronald B. Williams aka Ira Bex on September 4,2010 | 03:39 AM
It would have been nice if meyer kohane would have given the page number that article is on (the Google link). I went through that paper twice and never found anything related to Lincoln or that story. Then again, it was fun to look at 1991 hairstyles and read Calvin and Hobbes and The Far Side. Also interesting to see what kind of stuff Nickelodeon ran before it had SpongeBob, so going to that link was not a total waste of time. [heavy sarcasm]
Posted by L. Marie on June 29,2010 | 01:37 AM
You can definitely tell this was written by an attorney! I work with legal documents all the time and I find it fascinating that that the "legalese" writing style has not changed much in a century and half. But what has changed is the fact that Lincoln felt he could write this story without fear of being sued! Any attorney today would be well aware of this risk and would carefully mask any identifying details.
Fortunately, he did much better as a speechwriter.
Posted by L. Marie on June 29,2010 | 01:13 AM
I would grade this story B mostly out of respect for Lincoln, and because it is logical and well-organized, the sentences being reasonably well-constructed. It reveals Lincoln to be a well-trained lawyer, with an orderly mind.
As a "story" however, it violates several principles, most notably Elmore Leonard's rule to leave out what readers skip over. If readers did not know the author, it's unlikely they would stick with the frankly boring biographical summaries at the beginning.
Lincoln was certainly able to express himself more economically, and with powerful directness not evident in this example. (The Gettysburg Address) Therefore I assume he chose this more leisurely approach for a reason, probably out of deference to his audience. Before sound bites, second-by-second film editing, and MTV, audiences were more patient. They could stand quietly as they did at the Lincoln-Douglas debates, listening intently to each side's arguments, then reassemble their thoughts into considered opinions.
Posted by Etienne on April 24,2010 | 11:12 AM
Loved The story!!!nevewr ever thiught him capable.Please give ua More if more are to be has.Anyone care to comment on a recently published theory that he was born in NC?
Posted by jo eakins on April 17,2010 | 10:00 AM
The Trailor narrative is too thought-provoking to leave it alone. It is the American "Rashomon." I will put myself in competition with Abraham Lincoln- to write the story as a novel, historical fiction!
Posted by Wayne Soini on March 25,2010 | 08:47 PM
J'ai eu tort: The real story is not quite as fun as the results of subtle liberties Abe took, but it's still interesting.
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1893&dat=19911115&id=cL8fAAAAIBAJ&sjid=StgEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2322,1897381
Posted by meyer kohane on March 15,2010 | 10:38 PM
Regarding the function of "importantly" in the first sentence of the story, it is an adverb modifying the verb "was." The purpose of this modifier is that, of all Lincoln's roles in life which were mentioned, his occupation of lawyer is most important for this particular story because that is how he was involved in the story and knew its details.
Posted by Marilyn Long on March 6,2010 | 10:24 PM
J’accuse: The whole thing happened precisely as the brother told it, and the doctor provided the key—closed head injury. There was a struggle—they left him for dead. He, in perhaps a brief coma, certainly appeared to be when they came to move the body. They did in fact dump him in the pond. This snapped him out of it [the only miraculous part being that he didn’t drown first]. Delirious, he wandered back to a known refuge rather than [rationally] going to the nearest residence. Perhaps a traveler, who never heard of the affair afterwards, gave him a ride.
I say they did in fact rob him and were likely guilty of at least assault [aggravated by leaving him for dead], and probably attempted murder. The real mystery is how Ol’ Abe managed to get them off without an explanation of where that money came from—sounds like everyone’s minds were wiped clean when the guy showed up alive—like the ‘flashy thing’ in Men in Black.
Posted by meyer kohane on February 24,2010 | 04:24 AM
What does "importantly" mean, as used in the first sentence? If it means, "important," why add an ly to it? It works just fine by itself, unless you're trying to sound importantly.
Posted by Donald Higgins on February 21,2010 | 06:13 PM
I am shocked of what had happen.
Posted by breiana on February 18,2010 | 10:05 AM
I find it sadly ironic how everyone praises Lincoln for his greatness but fails to recognize his personal racist views and unconstitutional acts during war time.
Posted by travis on February 15,2010 | 11:00 AM
very interesting,he was indeed a great leader
Posted by phillious on February 12,2010 | 01:49 AM
I think Fisher had a twin brother who wanted him dead for his money and planned everything with the two brothers. Then the twin went to the Doctor, who did not know, and believed him.
Posted by victor on February 12,2010 | 01:23 AM
+ View All Comments