• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Travel
    With Us
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Air & Space
    magazine

Smithsonian.com

  • Subscribe
  • History & Archaeology
  • Science
  • Ideas & Innovations
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel & Food
  • At the Smithsonian
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games
  • Shop
  • Archaeology
  • U.S. History
  • World History
  • Today in History
  • Document Deep Dives
  • The Jetsons
  • National Treasures
  • Paleofuture
  • History & Archaeology

1968 Democratic Convention

The Bosses Strike Back

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
  • By Haynes Johnson
  • Smithsonian magazine, August 2008, Subscribe
 
Chicago police prepared for a battle with antiwar protesters
Inside the convention hall, delegates battled over the Vietnam War and the power of the party establishment. Outside, Chicago police prepared for a parallel battle with antiwar protesters who flooded the city. (Bettmann/ Corbis)

Photo Gallery (1/0)

1968 Democratic National Convention

Parties to History

Photo Gallery (1/5)

1968 Democratic National Convention

See the four political conventions that changed America


Video Gallery

Political Props

Political Props

Related Books

1968: The Election That Changed America

by Lewis L. Gould
Ivan R. Dee Inc. (Chicago), 1993

More from Smithsonian.com

  • Should LBJ Be Ranked Alongside Lincoln?
  • Parties to History
  • 1912 Republican Convention
  • 1948 Democratic Convention
  • 1964 Republican Convention: Revolution From the Right
  • Conventional Facts

As delegates arrived in Chicago the last week of August 1968 for the 35th Democratic National Convention, they found that Mayor Richard J. Daley, second only to President Lyndon B. Johnson in political influence, had lined the avenues leading to the convention center with posters of trilling birds and blooming flowers. Along with these pleasing pictures, he had ordered new redwood fences installed to screen the squalid lots of the aromatic stockyards adjoining the convention site. At the International Amphitheatre, conventioneers found that the main doors, modeled after a White House portico, had been bulletproofed. The hall itself was surrounded by a steel fence topped with barbed wire. Inside the fence, clusters of armed and helmeted police mingled with security guards and dark-suited agents of the Secret Service. At the apex of the stone gates through which all had to enter was a huge sign bearing the unintentionally ironic words, "HELLO DEMOCRATS! WELCOME TO CHICAGO."

If this Potemkin village setting weren't enough to intensify anxiety among Democrats gathering to nominate their presidential candidate, the very elements and conditions of Chicago life contributed to a sense of impending disaster. The weather was oppressively hot and humid. The air conditioning, the elevators and the phones were operating erratically. Taxis weren't operating at all because the drivers had called a strike before the convention began. The National Guard had been mobilized and ordered to shoot to kill, if necessary.

Even as delegates began entering this encampment, an army of protesters from across the country flowed into the city, camping in parks and filling churches, coffee shops, homes and storefront offices. They were a hybrid group—radicals, hippies, yippies, moderates—representing myriad issues and a wide range of philosophies, but they were united behind an encompassing cause: ending the long war in Vietnam and challenging Democratic Party leaders and their delegates to break with the past, create change—yes, that was the term then on every protester's lips—and remake the battered U.S. political system. As Rennie Davis put it, speaking as project director for the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam, the largest and most important group for the planned protests: "Many of our people have already gone beyond the traditional electoral processes to achieve change. We think that the energies released...are creating a new constituency for America. Many people are coming to Chicago with a sense of new urgency, and a new approach."

What followed was worse than even the most dire pessimist could have envisioned.

The 1968 Chicago convention became a lacerating event, a distillation of a year of heartbreak, assassinations, riots and a breakdown in law and order that made it seem as if the country were coming apart. In its psychic impact, and its long-term political consequences, it eclipsed any other such convention in American history, destroying faith in politicians, in the political system, in the country and in its institutions. No one who was there, or who watched it on television, could escape the memory of what took place before their eyes.

Include me in that group, for I was an eyewitness to those scenes: inside the convention hall, with daily shouting matches between red-faced delegates and party leaders often lasting until 3 o'clock in the morning; outside in the violence that descended after Chicago police officers took off their badges and waded into the chanting crowds of protesters to club them to the ground. I can still recall the choking feeling from the tear gas hurled by police amid throngs of protesters gathering in parks and hotel lobbies.

For Democrats in particular, Chicago was a disaster. It left the party with scars that last to this day, when they meet in a national convention amid evidence of internal divisions unmatched since 1968.

To understand the dimensions of the Democrats' calamity, recall that in 1964, Lyndon B. Johnson had defeated Barry Goldwater for the presidency with 61.1 percent of the popular vote, a margin eclipsing even the greatest previous electoral victory, by Franklin D. Roosevelt over Alf Landon in 1936. In mid-1964, passage of civil rights legislation had virtually ended legal segregation in America. Optimists had begun talking about America's entering a "golden age."

By that next summer, however, the common cause of blacks and whites marching together had been shattered as riots swept the Watts section of Los Angeles and, over the next two years, cities across the country. In that same initially hopeful year, the Johnson administration had made a fateful commitment to keep increasing the numbers of troops to fight a ground war in Vietnam, an escalation that would spawn wave upon wave of protest. In the 1966 congressional elections, Democrats—who had been experiencing the greatest electoral majorities since the New Deal—sustained severe defeats.

As 1968 began, greater shocks awaited the nation: North Vietnamese forces launched the Tet offensive that January, rocking U.S. troops and shattering any notion that the war was nearly won. Johnson withdrew from the presidential campaign that March. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in Memphis in early April, and another succession of riots swept the cities. Robert F. Kennedy, heir to the Kennedy legacy, had his presidential campaign cut down by an assassin's bullet after winning the critical California primary in June.

It was against this extraordinarily emotional background that the Democrats convened. Hubert H. Humph- rey, LBJ's vice president, had sat out the primaries but secured delegates controlled by the party establishment. Senator Eugene McCarthy—the antiwar candidate whose strong second-place showing in the New Hampshire primary had demonstrated Johnson's vulnerability—had abundant forces in the hall, but they were now relegated to the role of protesters. Senator George S. McGovern had rallied what remained of Kennedy's forces, but he, too, knew he led a group whose hopes had been extinguished.

From whatever political perspective—party regulars, irregulars or reformers—they all shared an abiding pessimism over their prospects against a Republican Party that had coalesced behind Richard M. Nixon. They gave voice to their various frustrations in the International Amphitheatre during bitter, often profane, floor fights over antiwar resolutions. The eventual nomination of Humphrey, perceived heir to Johnson's war policies, compounded the sense of betrayal among those who opposed the war. The bosses, not the people who voted in the primaries, had won.

The violence that rent the convention throughout that week, much of it captured live on television, confirmed both the Democrats' pessimism and the country's judgment of a political party torn by dissension and disunity. In November the party would lose the White House to Nixon's law-and-order campaign. In the nine presidential elections since, Democrats have won only three, and only once—in 1976, after the Watergate scandal forced Nixon to resign in disgrace—did they take, barely, more than 50 percent of the votes.

Changes in party rules have curtailed the establishment's power to anoint a presidential nominee, but the ideological divides have persisted; thus this year's rival candidates battled bitterly to win state primaries. And after such a divisive primary season, in the end the nomination still depended on the "superdelegates" that replaced the party bosses.

One 1968 memory remains indelible 40 years later. Throughout that week I had been a guest commentator on NBC's "Today" show, broadcasting live from Chicago. Early Friday morning, a few hours after the convention ended, I took the elevator to the lobby of the Conrad Hilton Hotel, where I had been staying, to head for the studio. As the elevator doors opened, I saw huddled before me a group of young McCarthy volunteers. They had been bludgeoned by Chicago police, and sat there with their arms around each other and their backs against the wall, bloody and sobbing, consoling one another. I don't know what I said on the "Today" show that morning. I do remember that I was filled with a furious rage. Just thinking of it now makes me angry all over again.

Haynes Johnson, who has written 14 books, covered the 1968 Democratic National Convention for the Washington Star.


As delegates arrived in Chicago the last week of August 1968 for the 35th Democratic National Convention, they found that Mayor Richard J. Daley, second only to President Lyndon B. Johnson in political influence, had lined the avenues leading to the convention center with posters of trilling birds and blooming flowers. Along with these pleasing pictures, he had ordered new redwood fences installed to screen the squalid lots of the aromatic stockyards adjoining the convention site. At the International Amphitheatre, conventioneers found that the main doors, modeled after a White House portico, had been bulletproofed. The hall itself was surrounded by a steel fence topped with barbed wire. Inside the fence, clusters of armed and helmeted police mingled with security guards and dark-suited agents of the Secret Service. At the apex of the stone gates through which all had to enter was a huge sign bearing the unintentionally ironic words, "HELLO DEMOCRATS! WELCOME TO CHICAGO."

If this Potemkin village setting weren't enough to intensify anxiety among Democrats gathering to nominate their presidential candidate, the very elements and conditions of Chicago life contributed to a sense of impending disaster. The weather was oppressively hot and humid. The air conditioning, the elevators and the phones were operating erratically. Taxis weren't operating at all because the drivers had called a strike before the convention began. The National Guard had been mobilized and ordered to shoot to kill, if necessary.

Even as delegates began entering this encampment, an army of protesters from across the country flowed into the city, camping in parks and filling churches, coffee shops, homes and storefront offices. They were a hybrid group—radicals, hippies, yippies, moderates—representing myriad issues and a wide range of philosophies, but they were united behind an encompassing cause: ending the long war in Vietnam and challenging Democratic Party leaders and their delegates to break with the past, create change—yes, that was the term then on every protester's lips—and remake the battered U.S. political system. As Rennie Davis put it, speaking as project director for the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam, the largest and most important group for the planned protests: "Many of our people have already gone beyond the traditional electoral processes to achieve change. We think that the energies released...are creating a new constituency for America. Many people are coming to Chicago with a sense of new urgency, and a new approach."

What followed was worse than even the most dire pessimist could have envisioned.

The 1968 Chicago convention became a lacerating event, a distillation of a year of heartbreak, assassinations, riots and a breakdown in law and order that made it seem as if the country were coming apart. In its psychic impact, and its long-term political consequences, it eclipsed any other such convention in American history, destroying faith in politicians, in the political system, in the country and in its institutions. No one who was there, or who watched it on television, could escape the memory of what took place before their eyes.

Include me in that group, for I was an eyewitness to those scenes: inside the convention hall, with daily shouting matches between red-faced delegates and party leaders often lasting until 3 o'clock in the morning; outside in the violence that descended after Chicago police officers took off their badges and waded into the chanting crowds of protesters to club them to the ground. I can still recall the choking feeling from the tear gas hurled by police amid throngs of protesters gathering in parks and hotel lobbies.

For Democrats in particular, Chicago was a disaster. It left the party with scars that last to this day, when they meet in a national convention amid evidence of internal divisions unmatched since 1968.

To understand the dimensions of the Democrats' calamity, recall that in 1964, Lyndon B. Johnson had defeated Barry Goldwater for the presidency with 61.1 percent of the popular vote, a margin eclipsing even the greatest previous electoral victory, by Franklin D. Roosevelt over Alf Landon in 1936. In mid-1964, passage of civil rights legislation had virtually ended legal segregation in America. Optimists had begun talking about America's entering a "golden age."

By that next summer, however, the common cause of blacks and whites marching together had been shattered as riots swept the Watts section of Los Angeles and, over the next two years, cities across the country. In that same initially hopeful year, the Johnson administration had made a fateful commitment to keep increasing the numbers of troops to fight a ground war in Vietnam, an escalation that would spawn wave upon wave of protest. In the 1966 congressional elections, Democrats—who had been experiencing the greatest electoral majorities since the New Deal—sustained severe defeats.

As 1968 began, greater shocks awaited the nation: North Vietnamese forces launched the Tet offensive that January, rocking U.S. troops and shattering any notion that the war was nearly won. Johnson withdrew from the presidential campaign that March. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in Memphis in early April, and another succession of riots swept the cities. Robert F. Kennedy, heir to the Kennedy legacy, had his presidential campaign cut down by an assassin's bullet after winning the critical California primary in June.

It was against this extraordinarily emotional background that the Democrats convened. Hubert H. Humph- rey, LBJ's vice president, had sat out the primaries but secured delegates controlled by the party establishment. Senator Eugene McCarthy—the antiwar candidate whose strong second-place showing in the New Hampshire primary had demonstrated Johnson's vulnerability—had abundant forces in the hall, but they were now relegated to the role of protesters. Senator George S. McGovern had rallied what remained of Kennedy's forces, but he, too, knew he led a group whose hopes had been extinguished.

From whatever political perspective—party regulars, irregulars or reformers—they all shared an abiding pessimism over their prospects against a Republican Party that had coalesced behind Richard M. Nixon. They gave voice to their various frustrations in the International Amphitheatre during bitter, often profane, floor fights over antiwar resolutions. The eventual nomination of Humphrey, perceived heir to Johnson's war policies, compounded the sense of betrayal among those who opposed the war. The bosses, not the people who voted in the primaries, had won.

The violence that rent the convention throughout that week, much of it captured live on television, confirmed both the Democrats' pessimism and the country's judgment of a political party torn by dissension and disunity. In November the party would lose the White House to Nixon's law-and-order campaign. In the nine presidential elections since, Democrats have won only three, and only once—in 1976, after the Watergate scandal forced Nixon to resign in disgrace—did they take, barely, more than 50 percent of the votes.

Changes in party rules have curtailed the establishment's power to anoint a presidential nominee, but the ideological divides have persisted; thus this year's rival candidates battled bitterly to win state primaries. And after such a divisive primary season, in the end the nomination still depended on the "superdelegates" that replaced the party bosses.

One 1968 memory remains indelible 40 years later. Throughout that week I had been a guest commentator on NBC's "Today" show, broadcasting live from Chicago. Early Friday morning, a few hours after the convention ended, I took the elevator to the lobby of the Conrad Hilton Hotel, where I had been staying, to head for the studio. As the elevator doors opened, I saw huddled before me a group of young McCarthy volunteers. They had been bludgeoned by Chicago police, and sat there with their arms around each other and their backs against the wall, bloody and sobbing, consoling one another. I don't know what I said on the "Today" show that morning. I do remember that I was filled with a furious rage. Just thinking of it now makes me angry all over again.

Haynes Johnson, who has written 14 books, covered the 1968 Democratic National Convention for the Washington Star.

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


Related topics: American History Democracy 1960s Chicago


| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments (12)

that weird

Posted by ty on October 4,2012 | 01:12 PM

This is crazy

Posted by Mia on April 30,2012 | 02:08 PM

Too bad the´reporter didnt include a picture of when huge lights were turned on at 10 or 11 p.m. in Lincoln Park and police (national guardsmen?) in a wedge formation started methodically swingin batons at anyone within reach in order to clear out the park. My sister, a friend and I managed to run out of the park but as we left we were shocked to see buses full of riot-equipped police with guns blocking the nearby streets.

On the other hand, I didn't see any protesters with rocks or bags of urine. In fact, everyone was totally surprised by this show of repression in a democratic state.

Just remember, it could happen again.

Posted by Phyllis Correa on May 30,2011 | 02:31 PM

It isn't true that there were no weapons. My Father-in-Law was a Police officer in Communications, dying of colon cancer. They ordered him to report to Grant Park even though he wasn't able to walk a beat anymore after 30 years as a cop. He was pelted with rocks, had bags of urine and excrement thrown at and on him by "peaceful" protesters. At the same time he was almost run down by fellow officers on horses who charged the crowd. He was overcome by tear gas as well because there were not enough gas masks for every officer.
This man was always a fair and kind officer. He never beat a single protester even though by their actions he could have.

So while you want to believe that all of the bad things were done by the police and military, it isn't true. There were violent protesters as well as violent police and military.

The whole situation was wrong. Protesters should have been able to peacefully protest the Convention. But officers who were not abusing protesters should not have been attacked with rocks, sticks, bags of urine, etc either.

I concede that the riots were more the fault of the police than the protesters. But the real villain was Mayor Daley and the Democrats themselves because they didn't want the protests to be seen by TV viewers all over the nation.

That is the real truth. My wife and I lost a friendship because I defended the protester's right to demonstrate and he wanted to become a Policeman so he believed that you should speak no evil about the police. I, on the other hand, always try to tell the truth no matter what you think about what I may say. So he and his wife never spoke to us again to this day, 42 years later.

Unfortunately in today's world if you don't say the PC thing, you're rejected by all sides. That's life.

Posted by Dale on October 28,2010 | 03:46 PM

The photo accompanying the article is a United Press International photo that amused people then as it does now. By that time I'd covered events all over the world for UPI but Chicago's convention was one of the more memorable -- the "convention" was conducted on the streets, and cops were always on the lookout to tell us (and anybody, really) what NOT to do. Photographers would be told by senior cops that they were arrested, and then when turned over to junior officers, who released us, telling us to stay away from the stressed-out officers. (UPI no longer exists in any meaningful form and the 6 million picture library is now owned by Bill Gates company, Corbis. The photo is by Gary Haynes who still likes it.

Posted by GARY HAYNES on October 18,2010 | 01:01 PM

Learning about my United States history in English Composition class is great. As Americans we should all be so lucky to know and understand struggles-- without struggles we do not recognize our own existence. Without the counterculture protests we would not be who we are today. We must allow change within change and the power is to and for the people to lead ourselves to transform lives. This is a free country?

Posted by Tringa on June 1,2010 | 11:37 PM

I was there, right in the front lines during the Police Riot. We didn't have any weapons- after all, it was a Peace Rally. The police attacked, clubbed, and dragged my friends into paddy wagons. There wasn't enough room in the jails for all the people they arrested, so some were put in the basement of the morgue. I got away by doing passive resistance learned from reading about Gandhi. My friends had police records that kept them from getting jobs for many years.
Being at the "democratic" convention certainly separated me from many relatives and acquaintances who were on the side of law and order rather than free expression. I thought this was a free country, but Mayor Daley's police put a dent in that idea.

Posted by Linda on March 22,2010 | 08:20 PM

I watched the crowd in Grant Park last night (November 4, 2008) and thought back to the crowd in Grant Part in 1968, and as the official announcement was made that at least one of our dreams from 1968 had finally taken place tears of joy came quickly. We don't have peace yet, but at least we now stand a chance to be seen by the rest of the world in a more positive way and not as a racist, bigoted nation. After what happened yesterday, maybe we finally can achieve peace. Spread the word -- give peace a chance.

Posted by John Alexander on November 5,2008 | 10:42 PM

I wasnʻt at the convention, but I worked in downtown Chicago the summer of 1968. We couldnʻt sit three to a park bench at lunchtime; it was considered a "conspiracy." One evening we went to a theater to see "Guess Whoʻs Coming To Dinner." People were lined up outside the theater, single-file, against the theaterʻs exterior wall, waiting to go in. The National Guard rolled up in tanks and trucks, sent its troops with bayonet-tipped rifles and tear-gas masks to the curb. The Guardsmen lined up side-by-side facing us, a line of theater-goers. Someone mumbled something unintelligible through a bullhorn. Then we got tear-gassed. We were "an illegal assembly,"they said. The theater entrance was blocked, the building wall was behind us, and the only place to escape was toward the Guardsmen. When we tried to run past the Guardsmen, we got rifle-butted or clubbed. I managed to get past a Guardsman when I stumbled into him and pulled down his teargas mask. He was about my age, late teens, and was as terrified as I was. We were in a line to see a movie! And we got tear-gassed. That night the TV news said the National Guard was attacked by protesters in front of a theater.

Posted by Diane on September 2,2008 | 02:51 PM

Haynes Johnson is a great journalist whose stories I read for decades while living in the DC area. But, as with all of us regardless of age his memory of the week the 1968 Democratic Convention was held in Chicago is not flawless. He describes the weather that week as "oppressively hot and humid." Thank God it was not because that kind of weather might well have contributed to an escalation of the violence on the streets. The week before the convention was hot and humid with one day reaching 94 degrees. But a cold front came through the Chicago area clearing out the humidity and heat, thus making convention week weather near perfect. According to the U.S. Weather Bureau in Chicago, the first day of the convention had a high of 69 and low of 64. August 27 was 69/51. The next day was 76/52. And the last day, August 29, when much of the protester/police clashes happened, the temps were 76/59. Having lived in DC where Mr. Johnson has worked for the Washington Post for many years the warmer months are oppressively hot and humid, but days like the weather the week of the convention were known to us as "just another day in paradise."

Posted by John Martin Meek on August 28,2008 | 12:16 AM

I wish my mother, Roberta Keister, was still alive to give you her perspective of this convention. She had been a Kennedy delegate from Iowa up until that awful night in California. She went off to the convention an uncommitted delegate sitting on the platform committee. She was hounded & threatened by the McCarthy people to such an extent that she had to go into hiding. Unfortunately, between the phone system problems & the state delegation's attempts to keep her from harm, my father couldn't get in contact with her. We had 2 TVs on at home desparately trying to see her in the crowds as we feared that she had come to harm. That's my memory of that convention. She had many tales of what went on at that convention. I wish she was still here to tell them to you.

Posted by Ellen DeVilbiss on August 8,2008 | 12:38 AM

I was in my Freshman year at Penn State at the time, and to this day I too remember the rage I felt about what was happening a thousand miles away. It was lacerating, as Haynes Johnson says, and it left a gash in my political naivete that lasted a lifetime. How sad, and how diminishing it is for all of us who were young idealists back then. Thanks, Haynes Johnson, for your evocative rememberance, although it pained me deeply to read it.

Posted by Anthony DeCrosta on August 8,2008 | 08:17 PM



Advertisement


Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Emailed
  • Commented
  1. For 40 Years, This Russian Family Was Cut Off From All Human Contact, Unaware of WWII
  2. Seven Famous People Who Missed the Titanic
  3. Top Ten Demonstrations of Love
  4. Bodybuilders Through the Ages
  5. The Battle Over Richard III’s Bones…And His Reputation
  6. A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials
  7. Harry Truman’s Adorable Love “List” to His Wife, Bess
  8. Gobekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?
  9. Tattoos
  10. The Unsuccessful Plot to Kill Abraham Lincoln
  1. For 40 Years, This Russian Family Was Cut Off From All Human Contact, Unaware of WWII
  2. Uncovering Secrets of the Sphinx
  3. A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials
  1. Tattoos
  2. Harry Truman’s Adorable Love “List” to His Wife, Bess
  3. The Surprisingly Colorful Spaces Where the World’s Biggest Decisions Get Made (PHOTOS)
  4. Roberto Clemente: The King of Béisbol
  5. The Battle Over Richard III’s Bones…And His Reputation
  6. New Light on Stonehenge
  7. Power and the Presidency, From Kennedy to Obama
  8. For 40 Years, This Russian Family Was Cut Off From All Human Contact, Unaware of WWII

View All Most Popular »

Advertisement

Follow Us

Smithsonian Magazine
@SmithsonianMag
Follow Smithsonian Magazine on Twitter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian.com, including daily newsletters and special offers.

In The Magazine

February 2013

  • The First Americans
  • See for Yourself
  • The Dragon King
  • America’s Dinosaur Playground
  • Darwin In The House

View Table of Contents »






First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State   Zip
Email


Travel with Smithsonian




Smithsonian Store

Framed Lincoln Tribute

This Framed Lincoln Tribute includes his photograph, an excerpt from his Gettysburg Address, two Lincoln postage stamps and four Lincoln pennies... $40



View full archiveRecent Issues


  • Feb 2013


  • Jan 2013


  • Dec 2012

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • About Smithsonian
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics
  • Member Services
  • Copyright
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Ad Choices

Smithsonian Institution