(Page 4 of 4)
A very good chance, I think. It always depends on how well this film does.
It seems like these movies are very much of their eras, whether it's the 1980s or the Internet age and post-9/11. What do you think a fifth movie would cover?
It's still about keeping America safe. I find, whenever the situation arises, that there's a lot of national pride in this country. I'm really proud to be an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we have here. I would certainly fight for them. I'd fight to keep my daughters and my family safe.
Can you say the line?
Oh sure, yippee-ki-yay—


Comments
Dear Smithsonian: Regarding the acquisition of Bruce Willis' shirt from "Die Hard": Who are you, and what have you done with the National Museum of American History? For the past 10-15 years, my husband and I have grumbled over the disheartening change in direction of the Museum's presentation of American "history." Certainly, proper historic interpretation requires a multi-disciplinary approach. However, items from movies and TV (such as Dorothy's slippers, Archie's chair, and Willis' shirt) belong in a pop culture repository! An item such as Lincoln's hat makes sense: Lincoln was a real man - a American president whose actions warrant his artifacts' presence in Smithsonian. If Smithsonian is going to display pop culture items for public viewing, then please intepret them within a larger historic context (whatever that may be - it's the job of cultural anthropologists). Otherwise, I fear the message Smithsonian is sending may be that fact and fiction are one reality...that our "movie heritage" is, indeed, our heritage. Please, don't dumb down our history; it doesn't well serve the American public.
Posted by Pauline Lanciotti on January 10,2008 | 09:56AM