Die Hard Donation
Bruce Willis gives John McClane's blood-smeared undershirt to the Smithsonian. Yippee-ki-yay...
- By Amy Crawford
- Smithsonian.com, July 01, 2007, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 4)
The first one and the fourth one I did 80 or 85 percent. There are some things I just can't do. Or shouldn't do. But I did a lot more now than I did in the middle two.
Why did you do more in the new one?
I think because the stunt guys and the stunt coordinators were giving me a hard time. They were saying, "Oh, you're getting older now, you probably shouldn't be doing stunts." And of course that made me do even more. Which I think is another American concept.
After having the experience of being John McClane, do you think you could hold your own if there were a real terrorist attack?
No. I think there are a lot of people who are far better trained at that than I am. People who actually serve are the real heroes. I just act in films. But I don't think they can make enough films about soldiers and cops and doctors and nurses and emergency tech people. Those guys are doing a much harder job than I have to do, and they don't get enough thanks.
How do cops like the Die Hard movies?
They like them a lot. I was in New York, and New York cops—those guys really dig it.
What's the chance of a Die Hard 5?
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (1)
Dear Pauline Lanciotti, Four years later.
Bruce Willis is American History.
Love, Wuce Brillis.
Posted by Richeous King, Wuce Brillis on March 9,2012 | 10:28 PM
Dear Smithsonian: Regarding the acquisition of Bruce Willis' shirt from "Die Hard": Who are you, and what have you done with the National Museum of American History? For the past 10-15 years, my husband and I have grumbled over the disheartening change in direction of the Museum's presentation of American "history." Certainly, proper historic interpretation requires a multi-disciplinary approach. However, items from movies and TV (such as Dorothy's slippers, Archie's chair, and Willis' shirt) belong in a pop culture repository! An item such as Lincoln's hat makes sense: Lincoln was a real man - a American president whose actions warrant his artifacts' presence in Smithsonian. If Smithsonian is going to display pop culture items for public viewing, then please intepret them within a larger historic context (whatever that may be - it's the job of cultural anthropologists). Otherwise, I fear the message Smithsonian is sending may be that fact and fiction are one reality...that our "movie heritage" is, indeed, our heritage. Please, don't dumb down our history; it doesn't well serve the American public.
Posted by Pauline Lanciotti on January 10,2008 | 12:56 PM