Die Hard Donation
Bruce Willis gives John McClane's blood-smeared undershirt to the Smithsonian. Yippee-ki-yay...
- By Amy Crawford
- Smithsonian.com, July 01, 2007, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 4)
I think so. What I've been saying about the character for a long time is that he loves his country, loves his family. He has a very American sense of humor. This character, in all four films, has always had zero tolerance for anyone trying to hurt or do harm to innocent people.
What's the best part of playing McClane?
Going to see it with an audience. It's kind of like going to an amusement park and going on a big roller coaster ride. It's just fun, it's entertaining. It's still a lot of fun for me to be an entertainer. It's a cool job.
I understand you actually bleed your own blood at one point in the latest movie.
Yeah. I just got cut.
How often do you get hurt?
Not that often. More banged up than cut. I have a couple souvenirs from every one of the Die Hard movies.
How many of the stunts and fight scenes did you do yourself?
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (1)
Dear Pauline Lanciotti, Four years later.
Bruce Willis is American History.
Love, Wuce Brillis.
Posted by Richeous King, Wuce Brillis on March 9,2012 | 10:28 PM
Dear Smithsonian: Regarding the acquisition of Bruce Willis' shirt from "Die Hard": Who are you, and what have you done with the National Museum of American History? For the past 10-15 years, my husband and I have grumbled over the disheartening change in direction of the Museum's presentation of American "history." Certainly, proper historic interpretation requires a multi-disciplinary approach. However, items from movies and TV (such as Dorothy's slippers, Archie's chair, and Willis' shirt) belong in a pop culture repository! An item such as Lincoln's hat makes sense: Lincoln was a real man - a American president whose actions warrant his artifacts' presence in Smithsonian. If Smithsonian is going to display pop culture items for public viewing, then please intepret them within a larger historic context (whatever that may be - it's the job of cultural anthropologists). Otherwise, I fear the message Smithsonian is sending may be that fact and fiction are one reality...that our "movie heritage" is, indeed, our heritage. Please, don't dumb down our history; it doesn't well serve the American public.
Posted by Pauline Lanciotti on January 10,2008 | 12:56 PM