True Colors
Call them gaudy, call them kitsch, but archaeologist Vinzenz Brinkmann insists his eye-popping reproductions of ancient Greek sculptures are right on target
- By Matthew Gurewitsch
- Smithsonian magazine, July 2008, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 5)
I was immediately taken by how lifelike Caligula looked, with healthy skin tone—no easy thing to reproduce. Koch-Brinkmann's immediate concern that day was the emperor's hair, carved in close-cropped curls, which she was painting a chocolaty brown over black underpainting (for volume) with lighter color accents (to suggest movement and texture). The brown irises of the emperor's eyes were darkest at the rim, and the inky black of each pupil was made lustrous by a pinprick of white.
Such realistic detail is a far cry from the rendering of Paris the archer. In circa 490 B.C., when it was sculpted, statues were decorated in flat colors, which were applied in a paint-by-numbers fashion. But as time passed, artists taught themselves to enhance effects of light and shadow, much as Koch-Brinkmann was doing with Caligula, created some five centuries after the archer. The Brinkmanns had also discovered evidence of shading and hatching on the "Alexander Sarcophagus" (created c. 320 B.C.)—a cause for considerable excitement. "It's a revolution in painting comparable to Giotto's in the frescoes of Padua," says Brinkmann.
Brinkmann has never proposed taking a paintbrush to an original antiquity. "No," he stresses, "I don't advocate that. We're too far away. The originals are broken into too many fragments. What's preserved isn't preserved well enough." Besides, modern taste is happy with fragments and torsos. We've come a long way since the end of the 18th century, when factories would take Roman fragments and piece them together, replacing whatever was missing. Viewers at the time felt the need of a coherent image, even if it meant fusing ancient pieces that belonged to different originals. "If it were a question of retouching, that would be defensible," Brinkmann says, "but as archaeological objects, ancient statues are sacrosanct."
A turning point in conservation came in 1815 when Lord Elgin approached Antonio Canova, the foremost neo-Classical sculptor, about restoring the Parthenon statues. "They were the work of the ablest artist the world has even seen," Canova replied. "It would be sacrilege for me, or any man, to touch them with a chisel." Canova's stance lent prestige to the aesthetic of the found object; one more reason to let the question of color slide.
In the introduction to the catalog of the Harvard show, Brinkmann confesses that even he is a relatively recent convert to the idea that the painting of statues actually constituted an art form. "What that means," he elaborates, "is that my perspective has been molded by 20th-century classicism. You can't shake that off. It stays with you all your life. Ask a psychiatrist. You have to work very hard to adjust to a new way of seeing. But I'm talking about personal feelings here, not about scholarly conviction."
Past attempts to colorize, notably by Victorian artists, were based mostly on fantasy and personal taste. Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema's painting Pheidias and the Frieze of the Parthenon (1868-69) shows the Greek artist giving Pericles and other privileged Athenians a private tour of the Parthenon sculptures, which are rendered in thick, creamy colors. John Gibson's life-size statue Tinted Venus (1851-56) has honey hair and rose lips. One 19th-century reviewer dismissed it as "a naked impudent English woman"—a judgment viewers today are unlikely to share, given the discreet, low-key tints Gibson applied to the marble. In the United States, C. Paul Jennewein's king-size allegorical frieze of sacred and profane love on a pediment of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, unveiled in 1933, is more lavish in its use of color. The figures, representing Zeus, Demeter and other Greek divinities, are executed in showy glazed terra cotta. To contemporary eyes, the effect appears Art Deco, and rather camp.
While viewers today may regard Brinkmann's reconstructions in the same light, his sculptures are intended as sober study objects. Areas where he has found no evidence of original coloration are generally left white. Where specific color choices are speculative, contrasting color re-creations of the same statue are made to illustrate the existing evidence and how it has been interpreted. For example, in one version of the so-called Cuirass-Torso from the Acropolis in Athens (the one in which the armor appears to cling like a wet T-shirt, above), the armor is gold; in another it is yellow. Both are based on well-founded guesses. "Vitality is what the Greeks were after," Brinkmann says, "that, and the charge of the erotic. They always found ways to emphasize the power and beauty of the naked body. Dressing this torso and giving it color was a way to make the body sexier."
But the question remains: How close can science come to reproducing the art of a vanished age? There is no definitive answer. Years ago, a first generation of inquisitive musicians started experimenting with early instruments, playing at low tunings on gut strings or natural horns, hoping to restore the true sound of the Baroque. Whatever the curiosity or informational value of the performances, there were discriminating listeners who thought them mere exercises in pedantry. When the next generation came along, period practice was becoming second nature. Musicians used their imagination as well as the rule books and began making music.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Sculpture Greece
Additional Sources
Gods in Color: Painted Sculpture of Classical Antiquity (exhibition catalogue), edited by Vinzenz Brinkmann and Raimünd Wunsche, Stiftung Archäologie, Glypotothek Munich, 2007
The Color of Life: Polychromy in Sculpture from Antiquity to the Present (exhibition catalogue), edited by Roberta Panzanelli with Eike D. Schmidt and Kenneth Lapatin, The J. Paul Getty Museum and the Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles, 2008









Comments (31)
+ View All Comments
There are tests that can be done on the statues to determine how they were originally painted. The Greeks mainly used the colors red, blue, and yellow so I am not surprised that his reproductions are so eye popping.
Posted by Hayden on November 1,2012 | 09:26 PM
According to author Matthew Gurewitsch on “True Colors” classical antiquity means white marble. However, ancient Greek assumes, “their gods in living color and portrayed them that way too.” White-marble maybe the color of antiques which people collect them at the first time or the color they often see on the antiques, and it is also the color of a kind of precious stone that ancient used to make their items. Nevertheless, it is hard to determine what is the true colors of the temples, churches, or pagodas? Why did they choose to paint the church white, temple brown-red, and pagodas yellow? Maybe from the Renaissance, the first priests choose those colors and after that people continue to repaint. Repainted colors are never exactly original colors, but they are pleasure the eyes, and that the structures are to be saved, satisfying their owners. Similar to the author wrote, “Color contributes to beauty, but it is not beauty. Color should have a minor part in the consideration of beauty,” I like this article because it explains the value of colors to the structures, and colors are not absolutely contribute to the beauty. Contrary, the white marble, the natural color of statues is more importance. However, this article is somewhat hard to understand because it is not written concise.
Posted by Nghia Cao on July 5,2012 | 02:57 PM
This is quite interesting stuff, I had no idea that Thomas Bruce was responsible for bringing those tresures from Greece - unless I misinterpreted. I really don't know if I'm understanding the poem correctly, but it seems as if the author is bragging about someone that took things from Greece. The second poem was much clearer and profoundly worded. Right before I started this post - I was reading some other comments. And someone made a very good point, how do we know when the paint was actually put on these ancient treasures - very good question! The last sentence of the passage couldn't be truer,to take paint from any type of art - is equal to disfiguement. This was a very good article and very informative
Posted by Michael D. Jones on February 28,2012 | 05:59 PM
I saw the exhibit at the Sackler and it made me look at ancient and medieval art in a whole new light. Every once in a while now, I notice a tiny residue of paint on sculptured forms I would otherwise expect to be white. (In looking at cathedrals, I'm aware that many a statue is either a copy of an original damaged long ago or is an outright neo-gothic invention of the 19th century. Sometimes when you look at those buildings and think "how did this stay so sharp after seven centuries," the answer is, "it didn't.")
Posted by John D on September 17,2011 | 06:29 PM
Check out the book 'The Sculpture and Sculptors of the Greeks' By Gisela M. A. Richter (New Revised Edition - 5th printing, 1967) New Haven and London, Yale University Press. Chapter IX Technique - P. 148 (c) Color. Richter was Curator of the Department of Classical Art at New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art from 1925 to 1948.
As a semi-retired Artist and Public School Art Teacher, it was this book that peaked my interest in painted sculpture, and sent me surfing the web until I found the Brickman's" This is the kind of art/color/picture story that would spark my street-wise students to use the web creatively, and open up an exciting forum for lively debate: A major reason why we will always need Art in the classroom and in the lives of our young people of all ages!
Posted by Jose M. Feliciano on June 25,2011 | 09:52 PM
I just reread the original article and then went online to view the slideshow. I think the point the last prior commenter made -- that the Brinkmanns may be influenced to some extent by the vibrant colors found in the painted 16th century sculpture around their hometown, Munich -- has some validity. Even more so since the Italian Renaissance sculptors, led by Michelangelo, worked in white marble, while the painters did not.
Note a typographical error on the caption in the slideshow regarding the blue lion's mane: It should be "tufts" of hair, not "tuffs."
Posted by mark gruenberg on January 20,2011 | 12:19 AM
If this is indeed the truth and is widely accepted it will change the world's perspective on Ancient Greek art forever. Fascinating...
Posted by Anna on November 18,2010 | 10:53 PM
Check out this life size reproduction of Athena and Nike from the reproduced Parthenon in Nashville Tennessee: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nashville_Parthenon_005.JPG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AthenaAlanpainting.jpg
http://www.nashville.gov/parthenon/
Posted by eric on September 9,2010 | 08:27 AM
In 2005 I was amazed when I viewed Vinzenz Brinkmann's work at the Munich Glyptothek. The next day, I was at the National Portrait Gallery in Edinburgh and felt that the statues and busts would certainly be livelier if they had a spot of paint on them. I can no longer view sculpture without envisioning them in full color.
Posted by Ted Paone on August 26,2010 | 02:12 PM
Wow, amazing! The patterns on the clothes look like Italian knitwear produced today by Missoni or Marcazzani. It reminds me of the statues of deities in India, which are clay or marble figures painted lifelike and decorated with expensive clothes and gold. Maybe in India this particular tradition of polytheistic divination has lived on, as it was practiced thousands of years ago in hellenistic times...
Posted by Mala on August 22,2010 | 04:18 PM
First of all, I am familiar with this research,and it is more than half based on speculation.But let's leave that aside...
Hundreds and hundreds of bronze statues have been found in mainland Greece, and none or at least none I have seen(and I have seen many) were golden yellow bronze,or low tin bronze, like this one (second photo from gallery)..But were dark liver,or dark grey bronze aka high tin...
Secondly no research can reveal true shade of color,especially in cases of details such as sleeve decoration???????? and due to all kinds of weather,oxygen etc effects... the color,even if someone wanted to paint them in this ridiculous manner, would be far less bright and much more washed away..Look at the fresco in orthodox churches,even in newly built ones, the painted stuff is much more..how to say,desaturated...
Posted by Vojkan on June 2,2010 | 01:42 PM
Traces of paint no doubt show that the works have been painted on. I do not know all the research done on this megaimportant question.
Has it been established just when they were painted? As asked above by Karl Young.
Is there not indications in contemporary classical literature that sculptures were without paint, or with very little? Who were the painters?
Posted by Oystein Loge on January 28,2010 | 07:27 AM
Then, dear Karl, how do you explain all these color traces in the kores found in Acropole in 1886....? Do you think that someone unearthed them, painted them and then buried them again!?
Posted by Tasos Kakamanoudis on May 31,2009 | 08:26 AM
How do we know that the paints were applied at the time the statues were made? Maybe the paints were applied at a later date by idiots who thought that white marble was too boring. Perhaps there was a "realism craze" in ancient Greece where everybody started to paint all the statues. Some of the statues would have been skillfully painted by professionals. Others would have been painted by do-it-yourselfers, which would explain the ugly creations being discovered by Dr. Brinkmann. Honestly, we know that Greeks were skilled artists; they were reportedly master painters also. How do we explain such crudely colored sculpture?
Posted by Karl Young on April 10,2009 | 11:39 PM
+ View All Comments