Hidden Depths
Winslow Homer took watercolors to new levels. A Chicago exhibition charts the elusive New Englander's mastery
- By Robert M. Poole
- Smithsonian magazine, May 2008, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 5)
"A much richer picture of Winslow Homer emerges from this exhibition," says the show's curator, Tedeschi. Conservators at the Institute spent part of the past two years performing technical analyses of selected Homer watercolors, scrutinizing them with microscopes, X-rays, infrared light and other diagnostic tools to unlock a few of the master's secrets. (See p. 90.) Such high-tech intrusions would no doubt have driven Homer to apoplexy, but in Tedeschi's view, the new research only heightens the artist's standing.
"It reinforces his genius," she says. "Homer has long been admired as a watercolorist capable of painting quickly to record the most immediate and ephemeral sensations. Yet, as our line of inquiry indicated, his watercolor practice was also full of experimentation—studying, reworking and planning. While part of his genius was his ability to make his watercolors look effortless, they are often the result of complex and even labored artistic planning. But he never sacrifices that feeling of immediacy. You never see all the hard work behind the images. I think that makes his achievement even more miraculous."
It seems that way when you stand before The Wreck of the Iron Crown, which Homer carefully packed and shipped home to his Boston dealer in February 1882, with a $250 price tag. The picture still radiates a feeling of tension as the Iron Crown teeters on the edge of destruction: the sand stings, the surf thunders, the black sky bears down on the ship—and all these years later, the viewer involuntarily shudders.
Homer's eerie ability to convey the mood of the moment is one of the reasons his work endures. "You feel that you're feeling what Homer wanted you to feel," says Tedeschi. "If it's a sunny meadow, you're in that sunny meadow. If it's a marine subject, you feel the sea breeze and hear the surf. I wouldn't call it realism. I'd call it a kind of veracity. Especially in his watercolors, he produces a very convincing aura, which often includes a clear sense of what the temperature is, what the air movement is like, where the light is coming from. You just let yourself feel it, which is very satisfying."
His sojourn in Cullercoats, which occupied Homer for almost two years, greatly broadened his range of expression. Once known as the chronicler of American childhood and farm life, Homer grappled with weightier concerns in England. There he began to consider the precarious place of humans in the natural order. He produced at least 55 watercolors while living on the North Sea and completed another 20 or so based on Cullercoats after his return to the United States in 1882. They were more sophisticated, more finished, more subtle and larger than anything he had attempted before. He spent hours closely observing the light and gauging the weather, made careful preliminary sketches, reworked them in his studio and sometimes finished them outdoors with a model in tow, just as the desired conditions of light, weather and atmosphere fell into place. "I would in a couple of hours, with the thing right before me, secure the truth of the whole impression," he told a friend.
Homer came to admire the hardy men and women who wrested their living from the sea, risking their lives each day. They march through his pictures with their baskets, mend their nets and converse quietly from boat to boat on calm evenings. And day after day, they look anxiously to sea under racing clouds, waiting and watching for a loved one's boat to appear. Homer celebrates the dignity of his Cullercoats subjects, the fragility of their lives and the raw power of the natural world in which they exist—themes he would explore in other settings and by other means again and again.
His English stay proved transformative, says Nicolai Cikovsky Jr., a Homer biographer and the former senior curator of American and British painting at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. "It's hard to think of such an extraordinary change in another artist. His figures become more classical, more sculptural; his subjects more heroic; his outlook more epic; his meaning more serious. The work gets physically larger." For the business-minded Homer, bigger pictures meant bigger paychecks: "I will send you some water colors—large size & price," he wrote to a Boston dealer in October 1881, two months before shipping 30 new sheets to him. "You can keep them in a portfolio or have an exhibition as you think best."
The dealer, J. Eastman Chase, quickly arranged a show for February 1882, to good reviews. Homer's new work, the Boston Evening Transcript reported, was "positively exhilarating." More shows and favorable notices followed. "Homer is both the historian and poet of the sea and sea-coast life," said one critic. The influential Mariana Griswold Van Rensselaer, writing in The Century Magazine, described Homer's Cullercoats watercolors as "not only...the most complete and beautiful things he has yet produced, but among the most interesting [that] American art has yet created."
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (17)
+ View All Comments
Maggie Storey was my Great, Great Grandmother. My Sister and I visited the exhibition of Homer's work in Chicago in 2008 and were welcomed by the Art Institute staff who were genuinely delighted to meet us, direct descendants of Homer's favourite girl!
Posted by Kate Simpson on December 28,2009 | 01:18 PM
I have a lithograph of "The Fog Warning" which was my grandmother's and I love it, probably done about 1920 or so. It is signed by Homer and Hamilton Hamilton on the picture and also on the white edging. Can you tell me anything about it? Thank you. Kathryn Wentz
Posted by Kathryn Wentz on December 22,2008 | 06:32 PM
I've been drawn to the ocean and Homer my whole life. Your article provides another chance to have an interior conversation with and about him. Thank you.
Posted by Mary Anker on August 2,2008 | 11:24 AM
I look forward to each issue of Smithsonian magazine and eagerly await it's delivery. I read it for personal enjoyment with the added benefit of my continuing (forever) education. Before enjoying Winslow Homer's work, my favorite watercolor artist was Millard Sheets of the California W.C. School. Homer painting is my favorite of the last generation. Your artistic staff and production staff are both responsible for the wonderful and accurate offerings of this artist's work. I thank them.
Posted by Ron Erickson on June 11,2008 | 07:05 PM
6/5/08 I just got a chance to read the article, in the May issue, on Winslow Homer and was ready to gas up the car for quick trip to Chicago until I realized that the exhibit has already ended. Not much notice! I'll add my name to the list of those asking if the exhibition will make other stops.
Posted by Charles E. Johnson on June 5,2008 | 03:16 PM
Your article on Winslow Homer in the May 2008 issue prompted me to attend a viewing of the documentary on Homer in S. Yarmouth, MA on May 29, 2008. My interest has been enhanced. The exhibition at Art Institute of Chicago ended on May 11. Is another exhibition scheduled in another part of the country? Bob Dennehy
Posted by Bob Dennehy on May 31,2008 | 03:56 PM
That was an exciting story and like the others I wish more of Homer's art had been featured, but I am hoping to see more some day Thanks I enjoy the mag a lot.
Posted by SABRA TIRPE on May 25,2008 | 06:31 PM
Homer has been my favorite artist since I had an Art Appreciation class in college. His water colors are the best.
Posted by Betty Mizer on May 24,2008 | 06:02 PM
I am looking for a reprodution of a watercolor, by Homer, in your May, 2008 magazine. It was a tropical scene of a black boy under a palm tree. Can you please advise where I might look. Thank you, E Mahl
Posted by Edward Mahl on May 22,2008 | 12:01 AM
I love my Smithsonian magazine and eagerly await it's delivery every month. I read it for pleasure and to learn. ***** Now, I've never been a great fan of watercolors as they always seemed so fragile and temporary. But after reading Robert M. Poole's article on Winslow Homer, I have gained a greater respect and new appreciation for this particular art form. ***** Kudos to everyone involved in the production of this magazine ... from the writers, photographers, artists, illustrators, editors, make-up department, advertisers, sales department (ads and subscriptions), printers, paper suppliers, business offices, every single person, including the janitorial staff. Each of you are essential in the creation of such an outstanding product.
Posted by Mary-Lou Chall on May 21,2008 | 10:57 AM
I am sorry the article did not explore John Singer Sarget's watercolors and their similar devolopements. Did Sargent and Homer know each other's work? Were they rivals like Picasso and Matise? Was there a relationship with in their watercolor painting or was it just a case of "great minds think alike"! In any case, a great article! Thanks
Posted by Carl Aldana on May 10,2008 | 11:17 AM
This page was very interesting.
Posted by hope stapleton on May 5,2008 | 04:30 PM
Your conclusion that Homer longed for the comnpany of women because he painted them is absurd! By that logic, anyone who draws an elephant would wish he WAS one. We have come to expect better from Smithsonian than this.
Posted by James Baxter on May 1,2008 | 10:03 AM
A wonderful article. Thank you. The Art Institute of Chicago's Homer exhibit is glorious. Check out their website at www.artic.edu You may be able to purchase related items and prints there. The exhibit goes through May 11, 2008.
Posted by R L Caires on April 30,2008 | 08:36 PM
+ View All Comments