Urban Legends About the Smithsonian
Ever since its inception, the Smithsonian has been the subject of wild rumors about the Hope Diamond, Noah’s Ark and more
- By Jesse Rhodes
- Smithsonian.com, September 01, 2009, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
Myth #7: The Smithsonian owns something that once belonged to John Dillinger.
Fact: The Smithsonian does not own any personal effects of John Dillinger.
Backstory: According to some, a morgue photograph of the sheet-shrouded corpse of John Dillinger suggests nature was rather generous to the gangster. Newspaper editors fearing scandal prudently refused to run the image. However, a popular rumor arose asserting that the gangster’s organ was in the collections of the Smithsonian. This myth has proved so pervasive that the Smithsonian has created a form letter to respond to curious minds: “In response to your recent query, we can assure you that anatomical specimens of John Dillinger are not, and never have been, in the collections of the Smithsonian Institution.”
Myth #8: There is a subterranean archive center underneath the National Mall.
Fact: The Smithsonian’s storage facilities are mostly located in Suitland, Maryland.
Backstory: The notion that a labyrinthine network of storage space exists beneath the Smithsonian museums, under the National Mall, may have started with Gore Vidal’s novel The Smithsonian Institution and was most recently popularized by the movie Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian. Unfortunately, no such storage facility is to be found. The archive center depicted in the film is based on the Smithsonian’s storage facilities in Suitland, Maryland. However, there is a staff-only accessible underground complex of passageways that connect the Freer, the Sackler, the Castle, the African Art Museum, the International Gallery and the Arts and Industries Building.
There is also a tunnel that connects the Castle with the Museum of Natural History. Built in 1909, it is technically large enough to walk through; however, a person has to contend with cramped spaces, rats and roaches. A quick jaunt across the National Mall is the preferred means of traveling between the two museums.
Myth #9: The Smithsonian owns a steam engine that was lost on the Titanic.
Fact: While the museums cannot confirm this story, one thing is certain: the Smithsonian will not acquire or display artifacts culled from the Titanic wreck site.
Backstory: Inventor Hiram Maxim—who developed technological wonders such as the machine gun and the mousetrap—supposedly donated a steam engine used in a failed flying machine to the Smithsonian. The equipment was allegedly shipped from Britain to the United States aboard the ill-fated RMS Titanic. However, the ship’s cargo list—published in the New York Times in conjunction with the liability hearings that followed from the disaster—does not include any records of shipments made by Hiram Maxim. The Times article does state that “The cargo consisted of high-class freight, which had to be taken quickly on board and which could be just as quickly discharged.” Specifically listed are articles such as fancy foodstuffs and spirits, but it seems possible that a last crate of machinery could have been loaded on board.
Abiding by the sanctuary principle, the Smithsonian honors the site as a memorial to those who perished and will not disturb the remains of the disaster. While Titanic artifacts—such as articles of mail—have been on view at the Smithsonian, they were pieces retrieved from the surface of the North Atlantic.
Myth #10: James Smithson’s remains are housed in the sarcophagus in the Castle.
Fact: His body resides in the Tennessee marble pedestal beneath the sarcophagus.
Backstory: James Smithson, British scientist and founder of the Smithsonian who never set foot on American soil, died during a trip to Genoa, Italy. His remains were initially interred in the San Beningo cemetery, his gravesite marked with an elaborate sarcophagus (the one on view in the Castle). In 1904, the cemetery was going to be lost due to the enlargement of a nearby quarry, so the Smithsonian Board of Regents decided to collect Smithson’s remains and bring them to the United States.
Smithson was last disinterred in 1973. James Goode, former curator of Castle Collections, said it was because of ghost sightings. Officially, however, the reasons were more scientific: to mount a complete study of the coffin and the skeleton itself. Also, it was thought that documents about his life might have been buried with him. No written material was found with the remains, but a copy of the examination of the bones by the Smithsonian’s physical anthropologist Larry Angel (1962-1982) was filed inside the coffin before it was sealed and returned to the crypt.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (15)
Chet:If you've ever found that picture, I'd love to see it as my father was one of the AvroCar test pilots. I believe I've seen the craft you're talking about, and to my memory it was a nonfunctioning early build of the AvroCar, which was intended to have the canopies that you mention.
Posted by Walt Hodgson on January 2,2013 | 06:51 PM
I did my research on the "Hope Diamond" and the people who owned the diamond. These people lived happy lives until they took over ownership of this diamond. Then shortly after owning this magnificent necklace, Their life ended in death or some other tragedy, Not just a couple of people who owned this diamond, but each and everyone who ever owned it. You can't convince me that the diamond isn't cursed, because the "Hope Diamond" is cursed and will cause death or tragedy to anyone who owns it.
Posted by Connie on November 25,2012 | 09:37 PM
Wait, so everyone who owned the Hope diamond suffered terrible personal tragedy - and then shortly after the Smithsonian's acquisition of the Hope diamond, the country went into a quickening economic and social decline, which has since spiraled out of control, and from which it is hard to imagine it recovering, but the diamond is not cursed? That was not the most convincing argument.
Posted by Hank Single on August 1,2012 | 03:45 PM
Re: Myth #9
Why will the Smithsonian not acquire or display any artifacts from the Titanic? It sounds a bit odd considering the vast collection of historical items that the Smithsonian already acquires and displays, to refuse to do so for artifacts from the Titanic as well.
Posted by Elizabeth on November 9,2009 | 04:08 PM
I greatly enjoyed the article as did the readers of my History blog at http://endiscomingblog.com.
I will say this: if one is scientifically minded, this article cleared up a lot. If not, the article will only be seen as an elaborate cover-up for the great Smithsonian conspiracy to control the world...somehow.
Thanks again.
Jonathan
Posted by jonathan on October 3,2009 | 11:39 AM
My ancestor was neighbor and physician to the lovely lady who owned that blue diamond, she let her little dog wear it, and then the dog died. She beleived it was cursed, and what great washington lore.
Also the large head from easter island in the smithsonian looks exactly like the ancestor of vaudeville, BOB HOPE, pass that one on too, I have been saying it for decades and someone gave it to me.
Be well and enjoy... hope I can say welcome to washington to ya'll.
Dame Pixie, DC Native
Posted by pixie on September 14,2009 | 06:37 PM
I'm surprised you didn't mention one of the oldest Smithsonian "myths" -- that the museum is the final repository of John Dillinger's private parts.
Originally it was usually attributed to the old Army Medical Museum, collocated with the Smithsonian at one time, though never really a part of it.
After that museum moved to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology on the Walter Reed grounds, our tour guides often were asked about that "exhibit" also, and many visitors insisted that this exhibit was either at AFIP or the Smithsonian.
It's a silly urban legend, though with understandable origins, and I'd be surprised if it wasn't one of the most asked-about nonexistent exhibits at the Smithsonian.
Posted by G. L. White on September 12,2009 | 07:18 PM
"Myth #1: The Hope Diamond is cursed.
Fact: It isn’t. A coincidental string of unfortunate events befell its handlers."
This actually made me laugh out loud. Perhaps I'm just being difficult, but isn't that the very definition of a curse?
Posted by Jason on September 11,2009 | 03:01 PM
Very informative. Thank you.
Posted by Rosalinda R. Seneres on September 9,2009 | 03:48 PM
I loved this piece - thanks!
Posted by Elizabeth Evans on September 9,2009 | 01:12 PM
I grew up in Alexandria, Va. It only cost 25 cents to take the bus to D.C., so I spent many hours roaming the museums. Because I didn't touch or disturb any thing I was never stopped from investigating any portion. Other than the rumors about the Hope Diamond, I had never heard of the others. I found them interesting but unbelievable. The last time I was there, I was disappointed that the "castle", as we called it, was no longer used for exhibits, but I do understand the need for greater space.
Posted by Trieva Pelonero on September 9,2009 | 01:07 PM
I'm not a great believer in ghost stories, but let me get this straight. You discount the "ghost of James Smithson myths" in this article but then in Myth 10 you say that CURATOR James Goode (a presumably well educated and mentally sound man) had Smithson's body exhumed in 1973 because of "GHOST SIGHTINGS"??? Now THAT'S a story I'd LOVE to see in Smithsonian Magazine!!! Seems like somebody very credible and VERY modern is giving way more credence to the ghost myths than this article is addressing.
Posted by Kathleen Kennedy on September 9,2009 | 11:25 AM
What ever happened to the 'flying saucer' that sat on the floor in front of the fuselage of the ENOLA GAY before it was restored at the Silver Hill restoration area. No it was not the AVRO Aircar nor the Vought XF5U flying flapjack. It was a circular craft with a fighter like canopy and USAF written on it. It was obviously NOT of extraterestial orgin. Please don't tell me it wasn't there as I saw it, I touched it and i have a picture of it somewhere if i can ever find it. The only referance to anything like this has been the silverbug project, but i can't be sure. I would like any information and pictures of the thing as i wish to build a model of it.
Posted by chet mohn on September 8,2009 | 04:24 PM
I’m kind of wondering where you’re getting your sources from. It seems to me, that the Smithsonian would deny the truth of these myths to the public by default anyway, since many of these alleged myths, if ever proven true, would be jostling and create too much public stir. I can’t help but speculate...
Maybe it’s the bias nature of this article that overrides the necessary argumentation needed for both sides –which this article fails to impress upon- to whether these said myths are indeed, fact or fiction.
Or maybe it’s a lingering other sensation, as to why this article was written to falsify these myths in the first place, even with it’s lack of foundation, since its apparent that each myth needs more research and well-rounded evidence to even begin diving to the central nature of the myth itself, as well as disproving it.
It seems hasty to me, to print this article as it stands, with so many holes, without the needed sources and/or eyewitnesses to testify to the account. Instead, I’m left with lingering doubt, since much of what consists of the explanations, doesn’t really discredit the myths at all.
I'm only allowed 2,000 words in this comment box. I can give you some examples of speculation, in this blog at: buzzintermedia.blogspot.com
Posted by Stephanie Flood on September 5,2009 | 02:02 AM