• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Travel
    With Us
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Air & Space
    magazine

Smithsonian.com

  • Subscribe
  • History & Archaeology
  • Science
  • Ideas & Innovations
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel & Food
  • At the Smithsonian
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games
  • Shop
  • Art
  • Design
  • Fashion
  • Music & Film
  • Books
  • Art Meets Science
  • Arts & Culture

The Grand Women Artists of the Hudson River School

Unknown and forgotten to history, these painters of America's great landscapes are finally getting their due in a new exhibition

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
  • By Judith H. Dobrzynski
  • Smithsonian.com, July 21, 2010, Subscribe
View More Photos »
Field Beach by Mary Blood Mellen
Field Beach, c. 1850s, Mary Blood Mellen. (Cape Ann Museum, Gift of Jean Stanley)

Photo Gallery (1/21)

Untitled by Laura Woodward

Explore more photos from the story

Related Links

  • Thomas Cole National Historic Site

More from Smithsonian.com

  • America's 19th Century Highway: The River
  • Women's History and Heritage Month

When Americans took to travel and tourism in the mid-19th century, exploring the great landscape around them brought particular challenges, especially to women, who were constrained by the strictures of proper behavior and dress. But that didn’t stop a coterie of female artists like Susie M. Barstow, who not only climbed the principal peaks of the Adirondacks, the Catskills and the White Mountains, but also sketched and painted along the way—sometimes “in the midst of a blinding snow-storm,” according to one account.

If you have never heard of Barstow, you are not alone. The curators of “Remember the Ladies: Women of the Hudson River School,” a little exhibition in upstate New York that features works by Barstow and her cohorts, have set themselves the enormous goal of rewriting a chapter in American art history—to include these artists.

These women ventured on their own or alongside male relatives into the wilderness, painting the glorious scenery that inspired America’s first art movement. And as the show on view since May at the Thomas Cole National Historic Site in Catskill, New York, amply demonstrates, they made works that are just as awe-inspiring as those of their male counterparts.

“I was so moved by Harriet Cany Peale’s Kaaterskill Clove,” says Elizabeth Jacks, director of the Cole site, which honors the founder of the Hudson River school. “When you see it in person, it looks like it belongs in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.” Or perhaps other museums. Curators Nancy J. Siegel, an art history professor at Towson University in Maryland, and Jennifer C. Krieger, managing partner of Hawthorne Fine Art in New York City, have had from the start ambitions beyond mounting “the first known exhibition to focus solely on these women.”

Who are these women, so long ignored, that even experts like Nancy G. Heller, author of Women Artists: An Illustrated History,” whose fourth edition was published in 2004, make no mention of them?

Often they were the sisters, daughters and wives of better-known male artists. Harriet Cany Peale, at first a student of Rembrandt Peale, became his second wife. Sarah Cole was Thomas Cole’s sister; her daughter Emily Cole is also in the exhibit. Jane Stuart called Gilbert Stuart “father.” Evelina Mount was niece to William Sidney Mount, while Julia Hart Beers was the sister of two artists, William Hart and James Hart. Others—Barstow, Eliza Greatorex and Josephine Walters, among them—had no relatives in the art world.

Although women were educated in the arts, being a professional artist in the 19th century was the province of men. Most art academies didn’t admit women, and neither did the clubs that linked artists with patrons. The requisite figure-drawing classes, which featured nude models, were off-limits to most women. One artist in the exhibition, Elizabeth Gilbert Jerome, was forbidden from making art, an activity considered by some to be so unladylike that when she was 15, her stepmother burned all of her drawings. Only at age 27 was Jerome able to begin studying drawing and painting.

Undaunted, these talented women persevered, sometimes with the help and support of men like Cole and Fitz Henry Lane, who both gave instruction to women. Some women of the period exhibited their work at venues like the National Academy of Design, the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts and the Brooklyn Art Association. And others, like Greatorex, who was widowed at an early age, even managed to support themselves and their families with sales of their art.


When Americans took to travel and tourism in the mid-19th century, exploring the great landscape around them brought particular challenges, especially to women, who were constrained by the strictures of proper behavior and dress. But that didn’t stop a coterie of female artists like Susie M. Barstow, who not only climbed the principal peaks of the Adirondacks, the Catskills and the White Mountains, but also sketched and painted along the way—sometimes “in the midst of a blinding snow-storm,” according to one account.

If you have never heard of Barstow, you are not alone. The curators of “Remember the Ladies: Women of the Hudson River School,” a little exhibition in upstate New York that features works by Barstow and her cohorts, have set themselves the enormous goal of rewriting a chapter in American art history—to include these artists.

These women ventured on their own or alongside male relatives into the wilderness, painting the glorious scenery that inspired America’s first art movement. And as the show on view since May at the Thomas Cole National Historic Site in Catskill, New York, amply demonstrates, they made works that are just as awe-inspiring as those of their male counterparts.

“I was so moved by Harriet Cany Peale’s Kaaterskill Clove,” says Elizabeth Jacks, director of the Cole site, which honors the founder of the Hudson River school. “When you see it in person, it looks like it belongs in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.” Or perhaps other museums. Curators Nancy J. Siegel, an art history professor at Towson University in Maryland, and Jennifer C. Krieger, managing partner of Hawthorne Fine Art in New York City, have had from the start ambitions beyond mounting “the first known exhibition to focus solely on these women.”

Who are these women, so long ignored, that even experts like Nancy G. Heller, author of Women Artists: An Illustrated History,” whose fourth edition was published in 2004, make no mention of them?

Often they were the sisters, daughters and wives of better-known male artists. Harriet Cany Peale, at first a student of Rembrandt Peale, became his second wife. Sarah Cole was Thomas Cole’s sister; her daughter Emily Cole is also in the exhibit. Jane Stuart called Gilbert Stuart “father.” Evelina Mount was niece to William Sidney Mount, while Julia Hart Beers was the sister of two artists, William Hart and James Hart. Others—Barstow, Eliza Greatorex and Josephine Walters, among them—had no relatives in the art world.

Although women were educated in the arts, being a professional artist in the 19th century was the province of men. Most art academies didn’t admit women, and neither did the clubs that linked artists with patrons. The requisite figure-drawing classes, which featured nude models, were off-limits to most women. One artist in the exhibition, Elizabeth Gilbert Jerome, was forbidden from making art, an activity considered by some to be so unladylike that when she was 15, her stepmother burned all of her drawings. Only at age 27 was Jerome able to begin studying drawing and painting.

Undaunted, these talented women persevered, sometimes with the help and support of men like Cole and Fitz Henry Lane, who both gave instruction to women. Some women of the period exhibited their work at venues like the National Academy of Design, the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts and the Brooklyn Art Association. And others, like Greatorex, who was widowed at an early age, even managed to support themselves and their families with sales of their art.

Though their paintings were largely left out of the story of American art, the exhibition displays work that reflects the same romantic sensibility, respect for balance, luminosity and love of picturesque landscapes as those of artists like Cole, Asher B. Durand and Frederic Church. “These paintings aren’t particularly feminine; they’re not flowery,” Jacks says. “If you walked into the show, you’d just say these are a group of Hudson River school paintings. They are part of the movement. It’s our own problem that we haven’t included them in the history of the Hudson River school.”

Jacks says the show came about after a board member and a former board member of the Cole site separately asked, “What about the women?” She contacted Siegel, with whom she had worked previously. Siegel, who had already been working on the subject, then called Krieger, who she thought would know which private collectors owned works by these artists. Krieger, whose interests include feminist art history, was delighted: on her own, she had hired an assistant to help her research this area. “We had all conceived it separately, on a parallel track,” she explains.

According to Jacks, visitors to the show are amazed by the quality achieved by artists wholly unfamiliar to them. “The number one question we’ve been asked is ‘why hasn’t anyone done this before?’ I don’t know how to answer that,” she says.

The exhibition has provoked another desired response, though. In hopes of creating a larger exhibition that might travel to other venues, the curators are in search of more works, They have already added to their list of potential works to borrow and artists to include. Among the artists new to Krieger are Emma Roseloe Sparks Prentice, Margaretta Angelica Peale and Rachel Ramsey Wiles (mother of Irving Wiles).

The exhibition in Catskill runs through October.

And then—after the paintings, drawings and photographs are returned to their owners—Siegel and Krieger will begin work on the larger task of ensuring that these women become part of the American art narrative. To add that chapter, says Siegel, “there is much more work to be done.”

Editor's Note -- July 29, 2010: An earlier version of this story indicated that the "Remember the Ladies" exhibition would be moving to the New Britain Museum of American Art. It is no longer scheduled to be shown at that museum.


Single Page 1 2 Next »

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


Related topics: Painting Women's History Painters 19th Century


| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments (25)

Could I send you a photo of an old picture that we were told was in the Hudson Valley style but not signed? Hoping you could provide some guidance. Thanks

Posted by Mat Bampton on January 22,2012 | 06:59 PM

Thank you for your article and lovely images. They were a pleasure to view. We recently purchased an oil on board landscape by an artist named Marjorie V. Stevens. It was bought at an central New York state estate sale. The painting has the initials MVS on the ll, right of the initials is Mar.Stevens, and in the reverse in pencil is written Marjorie Stevens in the same hand as the signature in the front. It is a lovely painting measuring 10 3/4" x 17 1/4", framed in a 2 1/2" wide mohogany frame. Condition of both the painting and frame are very good. We are starting to research. Should anyone have any info about Marjorie V. Stevens we would appreciate a message. Thank you very much.

Posted by Eddie Cantu Clifford on December 14,2011 | 06:15 PM

I just purchased a painting listed as Hudson River Valley, done in 1831 by M. Wood Smith. does anyone know this artist?
I am guessing it may be a woman, and the only woman I have found is a Matilda Wood Smith, born in 1804 and lived in Goshen, NY., but I don't know if she was an artist? Any info would be most appreciated. Thanks.

Posted by debbie daugherty on September 18,2011 | 01:10 PM

Ooopps. I answered the wrong comment. It was not Dr. Wieting but Rebekah Mosby who asked about an artist named Helen.

Posted by Dolly MacIntyre on August 1,2011 | 12:53 AM

In response to Dr. Wieting's quest for a painter named Helen, I have the following:
Helen Knowlton 1832-1918
Helen Merriam b. 1844
Helen Nicolay 1866-1954

These women did paint landscapes in the White Mountains of NH

Posted by Dolly MacIntyre on August 1,2011 | 12:47 AM

I have been researching Women Artists of the White Mountains (NH): 1840-1940 for 20 years and now have a list of 150 who are known to have painted White Mountain subjects. I am hopeful that my work wll eventually be printed and the work exhibited so the world will know the other HALF of the American art story.

Posted by Dolly MacItyre on August 1,2011 | 12:36 AM

WAS A CATALOGUE OF "THE GRAND WOMEN ARTISTS OF THE HUDSON RIVER SCHOOL" SHOW PUBLISHED? IS IT AVAILABLE? IF SO, HOW CAN ONE OBTAIN IT? HG

Posted by HARRIET GROSE on November 14,2010 | 09:53 AM

Finally this is being documented. i would love to write for your upcoming projects.

Posted by Elizabeth Rogers on October 18,2010 | 01:18 AM

There are others not mentioned here, although I have no idea if their work has survived. Eliza, sister of Albert Bierstadt, was an artist in her own right. And Hudson River School artist William Haseltine, also of the Tenth Street Studios in NYC, was brought up in an artistic family in which his mother was an artist. David Delo, author of a forthcoming historical biography of Albert Bierstadt.

Posted by David M. Delo on October 6,2010 | 08:10 PM

If one clicks on the box on the right labeled "Photo Gallery," one can see numerous beautiful examples of the artists' works.

Posted by Deborah C. Pollack on August 29,2010 | 08:56 AM

The exhibit, "Remember the Ladies" is at the Thomas Cole House in Catskill, NY. Just google Thomas Cole House and you'll get all the info. As for artist Emily Cole, she was Thomas Cole's daughter, not Sarah's.

Posted by Carolyn Bennett on August 28,2010 | 04:53 PM

I am perplexed that only one photograph of an exhibited work was included in this online story. The internet is a medium designed for enriched content, but in a story about forgotten works of art, the magazine has forgotten to include images of the works displayed in the exhibit.

I was also surprised by the use of the word "little" to describe the exhibit, which belittles the exhibit and the story. Don't make judgments for readers; tell us how many paintings, sketches and drawings are displayed and let us judge for ourselves.

Posted by Barbara Mack on August 26,2010 | 05:42 AM

It's truly refreshing to find an article devoted to women artists (obviously a neglected subject for generations), and to 19th century aesthetics as well. I am biased, of course; I collect 19th century American paintings, and have a number of works by women, including several (Mellen, Woodward, Greatorex and Coman) mentioned or illustrated in this article. It is worth emphasizing, however, as a counterpoint to the sincere enthusiasm and energetic encouragement of most of the commentators above, that to this very day, women's art - works fully as vigorous, skilled, arresting and profound as that of their male counterparts - is still largely disdained by curators and collectors alike. Exhibits and articles like this one will, of course, help broaden the artistic vision of curators everywhere, but I wonder how long it will be before the marketplace accords women's art the monetary values its aesthetic merit deserves. Since I'm still collecting, I'm in no rush: paintings by women have been the greatest bargains I've ever encountered in the world of fine art trading. But the bias against women artists remains an observable, if inexplicable, fact.

Posted by William F. Wieting, M.D., York Harbor, Maine on August 25,2010 | 06:31 PM

It's still not clear to me which Smithsonian Museum is exhibiting this Hudson River School collection. Will someone point me in the right direction, please?

Posted by Elizabeth Macklin on August 21,2010 | 12:55 PM

I bought a painting in Charleston about 1960 which the shop owner said was by a Hudson Valley School artist. It is signed "Andre Francois" and dated 1851 on the front of the canvas.

Donald Keyes of the Georgia Museum of Art ( Athens, Ga.) told me several years ago that Francois was born in Belgium and later came to the United States and worked with the Hudson Valley School. My painting is a portrait of a young girl looking over her back at the viewer ( this is what I found intriguing about the painting). I have been able to find very little on the Internet about Francois. One note said he had a painting in a public building in Upstate New York.

Could anyone tell me more about Andre Francois , or where to find information? Thank you in advance.

Marjorie Newton

Posted by Marjorie Fowler Newton on August 17,2010 | 03:04 PM

My husband and I just (today) purchased a painting that appears to be from the Hudson River School. We can make out a few writings on the stretcher, including "Painted by Helen ....(can't read that part)" and underneath, "1892." I think the word "Cobbleskill" may also be included. The stretcher has penciled comments, also hard to read, that I think have to do with the purchaser. They read "Mrs. ... Whit(bread?)." 75, plus some initials. My guess is that the 75 was the price of the very lovely frame. I can provide photos of the painting and the writings on the frame. Does anyone know of a painter with the first name Helen who would have been working in 1892? Thanks so much.

Posted by Rebekah Presson Mosby on August 13,2010 | 07:17 PM

Wonderful story and illustrations!!
It's about time.

Posted by Sandy Gold on August 7,2010 | 05:34 PM

Has anyone published a book of the paintings and lives of these woman? I find these paintings very exciting.

Posted by Joy Greive on August 6,2010 | 10:38 PM

The National Museum of Women in the Arts should be a prime research base for this type of exhibition. If these painters are not already included in the NMWA, collaboration would be a tremendous way to augment the status of early American women painters so that we can continue to "Remember the Ladies" by making them known to subsequent generations.

Posted by Jeannine Koessel on August 6,2010 | 04:49 PM

Good art, better than today's, if Mellen's is a representative sample. Gretchen Rogers b. 1981 or 1881? HP

Posted by Howard Pierson on August 6,2010 | 01:29 PM

I am an independent art lecturer in the Long Island area I would be very excitied to develop a programme on the Ladies of the Hudson River School
I believe art lovers on Long Island would relish seeing the works of these Women Artists
Is there a catalogue of the exhibit that I can purchase? Where can I gather more information for a programme?

thank you

Posted by louise cella caruso on August 6,2010 | 10:18 AM

need more picture and less words.... interesting subject

Posted by anthony hyde, jr. on August 5,2010 | 06:58 PM

What a great online article! I set out to look into the women of the Hudson School era. I have a lovely oil painting by my great grandmother who lived in that area during the last half of the 1800's. It was due to my intrigue to find out more about this artwork that I stumbled on this article and was even more intrigued to find work by Laura Woodward as that was my Great Grandmother's last name - perhaps a family member.

Posted by S. Abbott on August 4,2010 | 12:27 PM

“Remember the Ladies” is an historic, beautiful exhibition and well worth viewing. The excellent article, “The Grand Women Artists of the Hudson River School” brings up a number of issues concerning nineteenth-century American women landscape artists and why they became forgotten. Additionally prompting obscurity was that the women themselves did not promote themselves on a wide scale. The trait of modesty was instilled in their upbringing. Young ladies were taught not to spout their own accomplishments lest they be despised. Yet another boulder in the way was that the media held a condescending attitude towards the women landscape painters and while some male colleagues taught and helped the “ladies,” others looked down upon them. Despite all of this, their powerful paintings remain striking and clearly not feminine. Indeed one Catskill painting by one of the “Grand Women”—Laura Woodward (signed L. Woodward) was later thought to be painted by a man.

Perennially searching for exotic locales to paint, Laura Woodward (1834-1926) hiked throughout Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New Jersey, the White Mountains, the Green Mountains, the Adirondacks, the ocean cliffs of Maine, and traveled south to Florida in the nineteenth-century. She fell in love with Florida’s tropical beauty and braved alligators, bears, and panthers while painting in its jungle and swamp interiors (including the Everglades), and became Florida’s most important nineteenth-century women artist as well as one of its greatest publicists. Woodward was also the impetus that sparked the development of Palm Beach. I wrote the book about this extraordinary woman artist and am thrilled that “Remember the Ladies” is a success. All the “ladies” well deserve the accolades they receive. www.laurawoodwardartist.com/woodwardbiography.html

Posted by Deborah C. Pollack on August 3,2010 | 01:49 PM

How inspiring it was to learn of this exhibition! As Dobrzynski observes, its curators “have set themselves the enormous goal of rewriting a chapter in American art history,” of “ensuring that these women become part of the American art narrative.” It will not be easy to accomplish that goal, however, given the state of today’s culture. Landscape painters working in the Hudson River tradition in recent years, for example, have been largely ignored by the artworld, which overwhelmingly favors so-called contemporary art. It remains to be seen if Siegel and Krieger can succeed in such an environment.

A similar laudable uphill effort to rewrite a chapter of American art history occurred in 2001. The focus then was the Boston School of painting. It featured two concurrent exhibitions that also remembered the ladies---“A Studio of Her Own: Women Artists in Boston 1870-1940,” at the Museum of Fine Art, and “A Woman’s Perspective: Founding and Early Women Members of the Guild of Boston Artists, 1914-1945,” at the Guild’s own galleries [ http://www.guildofbostonartists.org/history_women.htm ]. See ‘The Boston Painters: 1900-1930' by R.H. Ives Gammell (1893-1981) for further information. (Gammell, a painter and teacher in the Boston tradition, was instrumental in keeping it alive. His influence is still felt today among contemporary Classical Realist painters.)

Dobrzynski notes that the painters represented in “Remember the Ladies” are not mentioned in the fourth edition of ‘Women Artists: An Illustrated History’ (2004). A quick online check of the book’s index suggests that the women associated with the early years of the Guild of Boston Artists may have been overlooked as well. Among the missing are Gretchen Rogers (1981-1967) and Elizabeth Paxton (1877-1971), the wife of William McGregor Paxton (1869-1961), one of the preeminent painters of the Boston School.

Louis Torres, Co-Editor, Aristos (An Online Review of the Arts) - http://www.aristos.org

Posted by Louis Torres on July 29,2010 | 02:32 PM



Advertisement


Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Emailed
  • Commented
  1. The Revolutionary Effect of the Paperback Book
  2. Will the Real Great Gatsby Please Stand Up?
  3. TKO By Checkmate: Inside the World of Chessboxing
  4. Never Underestimate the Power of a Paint Tube
  5. The Story Behind Banksy
  6. The Saddest Movie in the World
  7. Teller Reveals His Secrets
  8. A Brief History of Chocolate
  9. When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
  10. How Posters Helped Shape America and Change the World
  1. Before There Was Photoshop, These Photographers Knew How to Manipulate an Image
  2. A Brief History of Chocolate
  3. Do Kids Have Too Much Homework?

View All Most Popular »

Advertisement

Follow Us

Smithsonian Magazine
@SmithsonianMag
Follow Smithsonian Magazine on Twitter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian.com, including daily newsletters and special offers.

In The Magazine

May 2013

  • Patriot Games
  • The Next Revolution
  • Blowing Up The Art World
  • The Body Eclectic
  • Microbe Hunters

View Table of Contents »






First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State   Zip
Email


Travel with Smithsonian




Smithsonian Store

Stars and Stripes Throw

Our exclusive Stars and Stripes Throw is a three-layer adaption of the 1861 “Stars and Stripes” quilt... $65



View full archiveRecent Issues


  • May 2013


  • Apr 2013


  • Mar 2013

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • About Smithsonian
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics
  • Member Services
  • Copyright
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Ad Choices

Smithsonian Institution