Teaching Cops to See
At New York City's Metropolitan Museum of Art, Amy Herman schools police in the fine art of deductive observation
- By Neal Hirschfeld
- Photographs by Amy Toensing
- Smithsonian magazine, October 2009, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 5)
Eyeballing the older couple, Thursland offered, "They don't know where they're gonna be living come January. "
They were George and Laura Bush; the younger couple, Barack and Michelle Obama.
Herman, who grew up in Somerset, New Jersey, and earned a master's degree in art history as well as a law degree, began her career as an attorney in a private firm. But after a while her lifelong love of art held sway, and she went on to manage programs at the Brooklyn Museum of Art, assist the director of the Frick Collection in Manhattan and give lectures on 19th-century American and French paintings at the Met (which she still does). She's currently the director of educational development for the New York City public television station WNET. She began teaching her three-hour "Art of Perception" course at the Frick in 2004, to medical students at first. Then, over pizza one night with a friend who wondered why Herman limited her students to future physicians, Herman recalled a harrowing experience she had had while studying law at George Washington University.
Assigned by a professor to accompany police on patrol runs, she had raced with two cops to the scene of a raucous domestic dispute. Standing on the landing below, Herman watched one officer bang on an apartment door while the other nervously fingered his handgun. What the first officer saw when the door opened—a whining child, say, or a shotgun-toting madman—and how he communicated that information to his partner could have life-or-death consequences, she realized.
The following Monday, Herman made a cold call to the New York City Police Academy to pitch her course. And four months later, she was teaching NYPD captains at the Frick. One comment she remembers was an officer's take on Claude Lorrain's 17th-century painting Sermon on the Mount, in which a crowd gazes up at Jesus. "If I drove up on the scene and saw all these people looking up," the cop said, "I'd figure I had a jumper."
Herman, speaking to the class I attended, underscored the need for precision by recounting the murder of a woman whose body was not found for more than a year, partly, according to news reports, because of a commander's vague instructions about where to look for it.
Anderson, who is often called to crime scenes, took the lesson seriously. Instead of ordering detectives generally to "search the block" for shell casings, weapons or other evidence, he said he would now tell them specifically to start at the far end, work their way back to the near end, look under all the parked cars, behind the gated areas, in the shrubbery, in the garages and in the trash cans.
One of Herman's graduates, Lt. Dan Hollywood, whose last name seems well-suited to his Jimmy Stewart-like demeanor, said her pointers have helped snag pickpockets, handbag snatchers and shoplifters who prowl the Times Square area. Hollywood coordinates the Grand Larceny Task Force of 24 plainclothes officers. "Instead of telling my people that the guy who keeps looking into one parked car after another is dressed in black," he explained, "I might say he's wearing a black wool hat, a black leather coat with black fur trim, a black hoodie sweatshirt and Timberlands."
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (35)
I read this article years ago and she inspired me to put aside my bachelors degree in psych and instead focus my masters degree in Liberal arts focusing on art history. I want to do what she does; I will have my degree my the end of summer. Thanks Amy.
Posted by Tj Smith on December 23,2011 | 04:01 AM
Ms. Herman's rules for the class and how she asked questions really inspired me to restructure an ABE writing class I teach. Many thanks for a fine article and for the ideas on how to better encourage active, thoughtful participation in a class.
Posted by Carstens Smith on February 23,2011 | 10:29 PM
Hello I am a professor at the U of Paris8 and I teach English for art students. I would be most interested in learning more about how to contact Amy Herman read her books or attend some of her classes. Considering that I am far I suspect this would just be a first contact but I am interested in communicating her method to our students. Thank you for a new breakthrough (one of my doctoral student is working on the art of perception In Nabokov) and this is how I foolowed your track. thanks also for any further information,
Posted by Claude Safir on February 20,2011 | 08:58 AM
Would Ms Herman consider training others so that we could bring this to our state's police force and others. I'm an early retiree from a job in the technology industry with a great love of art - I'd love to be able to do something like this.
Posted by Kathryn Nelson on March 17,2010 | 10:33 PM
The arts can and should have just such an integrated role in our world, work and lives!
An organization development colleague and I recently took a group of staff through a professional development exercise at the University of Washington's Henry Art Gallery. In small groups they discussed and reflected on 2 different pieces for 15 minutes each and then a third piece for 15 minutes in silence. Reconvening, they discussed their insights about their jobs, the institution, challenges, new perspectives, etc. Art is illuminating and the lessons from this simple experience were powerful.
Posted by Renee Smith Nyberg on February 19,2010 | 06:45 PM
What sets Einstein or other geniuses apart from the rest of us may turn out to be little more than an early orientation to analytical thinking.
While education has typically focused upon rote learning and memory skills, leaving analytical thinking until much later in schools, the early introduction of logic and analytics during grade school may help to produce the level of education required for today's world.
Who knows what mankind is capable of through such a progression of educational indoctrination - if all are working with the same paradigm to produce method and outcome based analysis? It may well be the missing link to human excellence that the brain was especially made for.
Filling in the gaps of human knowledge is likely the remedial exercise of introducing and teaching the methodology of logical thinking to those in professions, in government, and in industry with the aim of increasing productivity, accountability and accuracy. The SEC could obviously use it given the indulgence of Madoff for 50 years.
Posted by Pat on February 11,2010 | 09:37 AM
Fantastic program! Lafayette College is certainly proud of you.
Posted by Sherri Jones on January 8,2010 | 02:27 PM
I have taught art in the public schools for 20 years and am ready for a change in careers. This is something I would love to do. I teach students how to "see like an artist" everyday. Cops. What a great audience!
Posted by Cynthia Marek Martin on December 10,2009 | 06:38 PM
Ms Herman, I came upon this article describing your work through another source; a mention in a Force Science Research Center transmission. I train for Brink's Inc. and one of our main goals is to train our people to see, scan and assess when out on the street, as a safety and security issue. Whilst I can tell them again and again that this will assist in maintaining their safety, I will now have another approach to that training. Thank you.
Chris McDonald
Branch Training Officer/Firearms Instructor
Brink's Inc.
Posted by Chris McDonald on November 23,2009 | 04:45 PM
Amy, congratulations on catching the attention of The Smithsonian on your great program which uses MOMA collection for training. We're going to share with all of our clients who are looking for ways to engage their teams honing observation skills using the collection from the new Modern Wing at The Art Institute of Chicago!
Your great work will help us explain!
Bobbie Soeder
VP Mktg., Catalyst Ranch Chicago
Posted by Bobbie Soeder on November 13,2009 | 01:04 PM
Amy, recommending this as reading in my college Art Appreciation class. It's a breakthrough in thinking when the awareness is created, right? Nice work!
Thanks for a well written article, Neal.
Paula King
Art Professor
Posted by Paula King on October 25,2009 | 03:04 PM
I found the article on Amy Herman's course fascinating not for her course's concepts but for the remarks of the officers in the article. One officer, while discussing how he would be more descriptive in his assessment of potential perps, reveals a larger problem plaguing our police forces as a whole: stereotyping. The officer explains that instead of informing his subordinates to look for someone who is merely dressed in black, he would tell them to search for someone "wearing a black wool hat, a black leather coat with black fur trim, a black hoodie sweatshirt, and Timberlands." He is obviously (sorry Ms. Herman) characterizing someone in typical "Hip-Hop" attire as his suspect. If police officers are not trained to lose their preconceived notions of who may or may not be a criminal, then our justice system will always be plagued with problems. Yes, we should train cops to be more perceptive, but, more importantly, we should train them to look beyond clothing, skin color, and/or gender, when making judgements in what are oftentimes volatile situations.
Posted by N G. on October 23,2009 | 02:50 PM
Amy: Hurray for you, and lucky cops! If I can ever help let me know!
Posted by Felicia Blum on October 20,2009 | 01:51 PM
I teach middle school and we use a similar method for our appropriately named, Picture Study class. You can get lots of details on this method of teaching children about fine art, as well as nature, by visiting web sites dedicated to Charlotte Mason (a 19th century educator from England).
Posted by Leslie Sams on October 20,2009 | 01:14 PM
My brother, the graphic designer, accused me of being visually illiterate. I fear he may have been right. What about a course for us "visually illiterate" folks?
Posted by Connie Hoar on October 13,2009 | 01:55 PM
What a wonderful way to integrate art into the Corrections System. I know that many people can benefit from your observations. Is there a course available in the Metropolitan Area for the general public. I am a teacher and could use some of your ideas in my classroom.
Posted by Carolyn Isherwood on October 10,2009 | 09:22 AM
Excellent! A great course, and it is an aspect of art that gives it great pratical significance. I often tell my sister and brother-in-law to "use your words" when attempting to describe soemthing. Meaning slow down and carefully explain yourself. What do your mean? what do you see? This application of art is sure and "eye opener." Congratulations Amy Herman and thank you.
Posted by Lionel Monty on October 9,2009 | 11:58 AM
This is good and good reminder. To me this is nothing new. We have sometimes just got lazy in how we do things and we are sometimes all rushed to "get it done." For those of us who went through basic training way back when, maybe you went through "Powers of Observation Training," as I did, and I did the same thing with photos, paintings, descriptions of people and, of course, at the scene. It's important to "observe" before making any decisions about what we see in front of us. Have an open mind... and eyes, of course.
From Toronto, Canada
Posted by Colin Mackenzie on October 7,2009 | 11:10 AM
Very interesting article. I'm not a cop, but I'd love to take this class.
Posted by Another Amy on October 7,2009 | 04:23 AM
Very insightful article. I have saved the article to refer to in the future for discussions with investment analysts. You can look at an investment and not see what it is worth because you are not using your powers of observation. To be a good observer, you have to be precise in your language. Some additional reading or references would be good.
How do we become better observers?
Continue the good work.
Mark
Posted by Mark Rzepczynski on October 5,2009 | 03:39 PM
This reminds me quite a bit of the legendary detective, Sherlock Holmes. It is amazing how after all of these years, his observational skills coupled with his analytic abilities allowed him to produce a testable hypothesis - who did it, how, and why. The beauty here is that it forces a more careful description and the history of pieces removes it from modern context which risks some sort of bias (the Sermon on the Mount example).
Posted by Manjit Leo Singh on October 3,2009 | 03:00 PM
I am sooooooooooo proud of you. I always knew you were special and this just prooves I was right. Way to go, Amy
Posted by Carole Sue Gallof on October 1,2009 | 08:08 AM
Sounds a lot like VTS or Visual Thinking Strategies. :-)
Posted by Teresa on September 30,2009 | 02:00 AM
I teach reading to adjudicated youth at a residential facility in Canaan, NY. I thought using this method would be an excellent way for them to practice making inferences. I'm going to start with the art work and connect that to making inferences in literacy. Thanks for the inspiration!
Posted by Beth Wing on September 30,2009 | 09:02 AM
I think this is just fantastic. Amy's method can be applied to so many areas since people tend to see what they want to see or used to seeing. Certainly allows people to step back and observe. If there are any reference texts, videos, presentations,I would be interested. I am prepared to fly from Osaka to take the course at a heart beat.
Posted by Jay Bhatt on September 28,2009 | 12:30 AM
How cool is this??????? Amy - I am an old friend of your mom and dad's and mom sent this to me. I think this is absolutely fascinating, innovative and something that can be applied to just everything!
Nice goin'! Congrats! Mazel Tov!
Posted by Sue Werner on September 27,2009 | 09:21 PM
I teach high school art and I am always amazing at the improvement in the drawing skills when students draw what they "see" rather than what they think is there. I'm sure the cops assumed the solution before really looking. The details really do matter!
Posted by Marsha Mueller on September 25,2009 | 07:29 PM
I am thrilled to read of the deductive logic sessions by Amy Herman at MOMA in N.Y.
Art always can speak louder than words. What a wonderful teaching tool! And respect by doing so for the talents of the artist's images goes along with it as they study. Great article!
Not just the police departments should have such an opportunity, but wouldn't it be wonderful if these types of sessions wer offered to especially women? Along with self defense classes it certainly would apply to the awareness of surroundings and actions by people who might be laying in wait to harm others. We should all be more aware of what we can see and be thinking as she stated, "How would you describe this person...to another?" Could be very meaningful in preventing a crime or saving a person's life. Hightened awareness should be ingrained in all of us, especially we females.
Posted by s. j. madama on September 25,2009 | 06:29 PM
Great!
Posted by Thomas Beaver Sr on September 25,2009 | 05:10 PM
I am so proud of you. What an interesting article . I too wish I could take your class. I tend to take in the whole rather than the minutia of a painting. It was nice seeing you the other day. Y
Posted by Yvette Edelhart on September 25,2009 | 10:46 AM
I found this subject to be quite interesting. Does she have any books to reference? I would love to see more.
Posted by Joe Spodnick on September 24,2009 | 03:27 PM
I suddenly want to be a 'cop' and take Amy Herman's course.
Posted by Harriet Pakula Teweles on September 22,2009 | 10:08 PM
Very intersting. Nice to see some creaative thinking and teaching. Way to go, AMY.
Posted by sue hurwitz on September 21,2009 | 06:57 PM
Amy very good !!!! very proud of your accomplishments !!! im glad to have you on our side :)
Posted by jack brenner on September 21,2009 | 06:36 PM