Owen Edwards is a freelance writer who writes the "Object at Hand" column in Smithsonian magazine. Courtesy of Owen Edwards
Freelance writer Owen Edwards writes the “Object at Hand” column in Smithsonian magazine and occasionally contributes feature stories. His most recent story, “In Vogue,” about fashion photographer Edward Steichen, in the May issue is timed with a new book by Todd Brandow and William Ewing, Edward Steichen in High Fashion: The Condé Nast Years 1923-1937, and an exhibition through May 3 at the International Center of Photography in New York.
What drew you to this story?
I used to be the exhibition critic for American Photographer and as such I’ve always been interested in Steichen. He kind of orbited like Haley’s comet. Sooner or later, somebody would be influenced by him, or there would be a show of his work. I’ve been equally interested in fashion photography. So this was a story that brought both of those subjects together, which very much appealed to me. Not too long ago in writing an [article for Smithsonian], I talked to someone who worked for Steichen in World War II. (See video at right) I had recently had Steichen very much on my mind as a result of interviewing him. So this came kind of as serendipity that this fine book just came out and this exhibition at the International Center of Photography.
What was the genius of Steichen's work?
He was many things other than a fashion photographer, and I think what one sees with Steichen is a kind of Protean figure who really could do almost anything. The other thing about Steichen, typical of his age for an artist, was he went to Paris and lived for many years in Paris as a painter. That really I think taught him to have a high level of visual sophistication that some photographers who just photograph and start working in a studio real young and stay right in the studio from then on don’t have. I don’t think they quite have the 360-degree culture that Steichen had. You can see in his fashion photographs the influences of painting, literature and society. He knew which fork to use, and when he got people dressed up to be sitting at a dinner table in a fashion photograph they looked like whoever put the photograph together had sat in some pretty good restaurants. I think it’s a complete cultural identity that he had that made his photographs so good.
His photographs were mostly studio shots, different from fashion shoots today. But what makes them relevant even today?
I spoke with a photographer for the piece named Howard Schatz. Howard is a fashion photographer in New York who also has a monthly portrait photograph in Vanity Fair, so it seemed to me that he was kind of a modern day Steichen. I asked him what made the pictures relevant and he said that he felt that it was the attention to detail, that that’s why a photographer can always learn from Steichen’s work. One learns that it may take 1/125th of a second to do the photograph, but it needs meticulous planning to get it right.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Photography Photographers
| Tweet | Digg |
Comments (4)
I too loved the "The Tyranny of Cool" piece as a young man and now as a father would love to find it for my children. I've Googled for it and the closest I've ever come to finding it is Mr. Epilepsia's comment. Can anyone out there help?
Posted by Mark Wigod on October 23,2010 | 05:51 PM
I used to read and enjoy your articles in GQ like the " THE TYRANNY OF COOL" and the Good Life series. Where can i get hold of other similar readings?
Posted by Edgar Epilepsia on October 18,2010 | 05:36 PM
Dear Sir, are you the same Owen Edwards who wrote the essay "The Man I Didn't Know" for the NYT Magazine about 20 years ago? I remember using that piece as an assignment for a freshmen composition class when I was in grad school. I still consider one of the responses the best student paper I've received in over 20 years of teaching writing. I was telling a colleague about it, and he wants to try the same assignment. I still have that paper and the original essay from NYT.
Sincerely,
Tom McGohey
Posted by Tom McGohey on September 14,2010 | 01:26 PM
Mr Owen Edwards, Another great SR-71 story. One little comment though. According to Av week Aug 8, 2005 the incident that a crew member was lost was pilot Jim Zwayer and happened in Jan 25 1966. Don't think it was related to refueling as they were at 78,800 at mach 3.18 in a 35-degree bank when an unstart occured. It was another great article about a great plane by Bill Weaver, the survivor. KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND YOUR SIX CLEAR
Posted by Howard Allmon on June 29,2009 | 07:51 PM